Acta Informatica Pragensia 2021, 10(3), 257-274 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.1653764

Hateful and Other Negative Communication in Online Commenting Environments: Content, Structure and Targets

Vasja Vehovar ORCID..., Dejan Jontes ORCID...
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva pl. 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Information and communication technologies are increasingly interacting with modern societies. One specific manifestation of this interaction concerns hateful and other negative comments in online environments. Various terms appear to denote this communication, from flaming, indecency and intolerance to hate speech. However, there is still a lack of an umbrella term that broadly captures this communication. Therefore, this paper introduces the concept of socially unacceptable discourse, which serves as the basis for an empirical study that evaluated online comments scraped from the Facebook pages of the three most-visited Slovenian news outlets. Machine-learning algorithms were used to narrow the focus to topics related to refugees and LGBT rights. Ten thousand comments were manually coded to identify and structure socially undesirable discourse. The results show that about half of all comments belonged to this type of discourse, with a surprisingly stable level and structure across media (i.e., right-wing versus mainstream) and topics. Most of these comments could also be considered a potential violation of hate speech legislation. In the context of these findings, the political and ideological consequences and implications of mediatised emotions are discussed.

Keywords: Facebook; Online comments; Socially unacceptable discourse; LGBT; Refugees; Social media; Social informatics; Emotional audience response.

Received: August 10, 2021; Revised: November 8, 2021; Accepted: November 20, 2021; Prepublished online: November 21, 2021; Published: December 31, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vehovar, V., & Jontes, D. (2021). Hateful and Other Negative Communication in Online Commenting Environments: Content, Structure and Targets. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 10(3), 257-274. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.165
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bajt, V. (2016). Online hate speech and the 'refugee crisis' in Slovenia. In Atienza, B. B., Alonso, J. A. (Eds.), Migration and Asylum: New Challenges and Opportunities for Europe. Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
    2. Ben-David, A., & Matamoros-Fernandez, A. (2016). Hate Speech and Covert Discrimination on Social Media: Monitoring the Facebook Pages of Extreme-Right Political Parties in Spain. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1167-1193.
    3. Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper websites comments. Journal of Communication, 64, 658-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104 Go to original source...
    4. Council of Europe. (1997). Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Hate speech. Retrieved October 1, 2021, from https://rm.coe.int/1680505d5b
    5. De Maiti, K. P., Fišer, D., & Ljubešić, N. (2020). Nonstandard linguistic features of Slovene socially unacceptable discourse on Facebook. In Fišer, D., & Smith, P. The Dark Side of Digital Platforms: Linguistic Investigations of Socially Unacceptable Online Discourse Practices, (pp. 12-35). Ljubljana University Press.
    6. Döveling, K, Harju, A. A., & Sommer, D. (2018). From mediatized emotion to digital affect cultures: New technologies and global flows of emotion. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117743141 Go to original source...
    7. European Commission. (2021). The EU Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online. Retrieved July 31, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/eu-code-conduct-countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en
    8. Facebook. (2021). Transparency Centre: Community Standards Enforcement Report. Retrieved July 31, 2021, from https://transparency.fb.com/data/community-standards-enforcement
    9. FRENK. (2018). Guidelines for unacceptable speech annotation in online comments. Unpublished coding manual (Available on request from authors).
    10. Frischlich, L., Boberg, S., & Quandt, T. (2019). Comment Sections as Targets of Dark Participation? Journalists' Evaluation and Moderation of Deviant User Comments. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2014-2033. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1556320 Go to original source...
    11. Gagliardone, I. (2019). Defining Online Hate and Its "Public Lives": What Is the Place for "Extreme Speech"? International Journal of Communication, 13, 3068-3087.
    12. Haapoja, J., Laaksonen, S. M., & Lampinen, A. (2020). Gaming Algorithmic Hate-Speech Detection: Stakes, Parties, and Moves. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120924778 Go to original source...
    13. Kapidzic, S., Neuberger, C., Stiglitz, S., & Mirbabaie, M. (2019). Interaction and influence on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 7(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1522962 Go to original source...
    14. Kenski, K., Coe, K., & Rains, S. A. (2020). Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online: An Examination of Types and Predictors. Communication Research, 47(6), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699933 Go to original source...
    15. Lewis, S. C. & Molyneux, L. (2018). A decade of research on social media and journalism: Assumptions, blind spots and a way forward. Media and Communication, 6(4), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562 Go to original source...
    16. Ljubešić, N., Fišer, D., & Erjavec T. (2019). The FRENK datasets of socially unacceptable discourse in Slovene and English. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.02045.pdf Go to original source...
    17. Lünenborg, M., & Maier, T. (2018). The Turn to Affect and Emotion in Media Studies. Media and Communication, 6(3), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i3.1732 Go to original source...
    18. Massanari, A. (2015). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit's algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807 Go to original source...
    19. Meza, R., Vincze, H. O., & Mogos, A. (2019). Targets of Online Hate Speech in Context. A Comparative Digital Social Science Analysis of Comments on Public Facebook Pages from Romania and Hungary. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 4(4), 26-50. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v4i4.503 Go to original source...
    20. Mihaylov, T., Mihaylova, T., Nakov, P., Màrquez, L., Georgiev, G. D., & Koychev, I. K. (2018). The dark side of news community forums: opinion manipulation trolls. Internet Research, 28(5), 1292-1312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2017-0118 Go to original source...
    21. Moor, P. J., Heuvelman, A., & Verleur, R. (2010). Flaming on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1536-1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023 Go to original source...
    22. Orgeret, K. S. (2020). Discussing Emotions in Digital Journalism. Digital Journalism, 8(2), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1727347 Go to original source...
    23. Ozalp, S., Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Liu, H. & Mostafa, M. (2020). Antisemitism on Twitter: Collective Efficacy and the Role of Community Organisations in Challenging Online Hate Speech. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120916850 Go to original source...
    24. Paasch-Colberg, S., Strippel, C., Trebbe, J. & Emmer, M. (2021). From Insult to Hate Speech: Mapping Offensive Language in German User Comments on Immigration. Media and Communication, 9(1), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3399 Go to original source...
    25. Pajnik, M. & Sauer, B. (2018). Populism and the Web: Communicative Practices and Movements in Europe. Routledge. Go to original source...
    26. Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444 Go to original source...
    27. Petrovčič, A., Vehovar, V. & Žiberna, A. (2012). Posting, quoting, and replying: a comparison of methodological approaches to measure communication ties in web forums. Quality & Quantity, 46(3), 829-854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9427-z Go to original source...
    28. Pohjonen, M. (2019). A Comparative Approach to Social Media Extreme Speech: Online Hate Speech as Media Commentary. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3088-3103.
    29. Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519 Go to original source...
    30. Rossini, P. (2020). Beyond Incivility: Understanding Patterns of Uncivil and Intolerant Discourse in Online Political Talk. Communication Research, (in press). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314 Go to original source...
    31. Santana, A. D. (2015). Incivility dominates online comments on immigration. Newspaper Research Journal, 36(1), 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291503600107 Go to original source...
    32. Schroeder, R. (2019). Digital Media and the Entrenchment of Right-Wing Populist Agendas. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119885328 Go to original source...
    33. SJM. (2019). Slovensko javno mnenje/Slovenian Public Opinion (2019): Module Hate Speech. Retrieved October 1, 2021, from https://www.adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/opisi/sjm191/
    34. Smutny, Z., & Vehovar, V. (2020). Social Informatics Research: Schools of Thought, Methodological Basis, and Thematic Conceptualization. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(5), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24280 Go to original source...
    35. Su, L. Y. F., Xenos, M. A., Rose, K. M., Wirz, C., Scheufele, D. A., & Brossard, D. (2018). Uncivil and personal? Comparing patterns of incivility in comments on the Facebook pages of news outlets. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3678-3699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818757205 Go to original source...
    36. Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., Katz, J. E., & Miranda, J. P. (2019). The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 802-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701 Go to original source...
    37. Vehovar, V., Motl, A., Mihelič, L., Berčič B., & Petrovčič, A. (2012). Zaznava sovražnega govora na slovenskem spletu. Teorija in praksa, 49(1), 171-189.
    38. Vehovar, V., Povž, B, Fišer, D., Ljubešić, N., Šulc, A., Jontes, D. (2020). Družbeno nesprejemljivi diskurz na Facebookovih strani novičarskih portalov. Teorija in praksa, 57(2), 622-645.
    39. Vezovnik, A. (2018). Securitizing migration in Slovenia: a discourse analysis of the Slovenian refugee situation. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies: International, National, and Regional Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(1/2), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1282576 Go to original source...
    40. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Emotions, Media and Politics. Polity.
    41. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2020). An Emotional Turn in Journalism Studies? Digital Journalism, 8(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1697626 Go to original source...
    42. Westlund, O., & Ekström, M. (2018). News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media. Media and Communication, 6(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1775 Go to original source...
    43. Westlund, O. (2021). Advancing Research into Dark Participation. Media and Communication, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.1770 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content