Acta Informatica Pragensia 2015, 4(2), 122-139 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.653157

Proposal of Decision-making Model Using the DeLone and McLean's Information System Success Model Together with the AHP

Radek Nėmec, František Zapletal
Department of Systems Engineering, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Ostrava, Sokolská tø. 33, 701 21, Ostrava 1, Czech Republic

The focus of the paper is to present an evaluation of a proposed decision-making model concept. The concept takes into account the quality of a currently used information system's subsystem (the Business Intelligence subsystem in our case), as it is perceived by its current users. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteria decision making method is used to support the concept with a hierarchical decision criteria structuring framework. A selected part of the DeLone and McLean's (D&M) information system success assessment model is used for the determination of appropriate criteria (success factors). The D&M model is composed of information system quality assessment dimensions. These dimensions represent a solid base for surveying information system's users according to their perception of key information system performance aspects. The presented model helps to combine opinions of the management and users successfully when carrying out important information system related decision. The results also illustrate the possibility of using the D&M model in a novel application together with the AHP method.

Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process, DeLone & McLean's model, success factors, multi-criteria decision-making, decision-making model, evaluation through case study

Received: October 16, 2015; Revised: November 30, 2015; Accepted: December 11, 2015; Published: December 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nėmec, R., & Zapletal, F. (2015). Proposal of Decision-making Model Using the DeLone and McLean's Information System Success Model Together with the AHP. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 4(2), 122-139. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.65
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bajaj, P., & Arora, V. (2013) Multi-Person Decision-Making for Requirements Prioritization using Fuzzy AHP. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 38(5), 1-6. doi: 10.1145/2507288.2507302 Go to original source...
    2. Barclay, C. (2008) Towards an integrated measurement of IS project performance: The project performance scorecard. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 331-345. doi: 10.1007/s10796-008-9083-6 Go to original source...
    3. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7). 1-9.
    4. Chen, Ch.-D., & Cheng, CH.-J. (2009) Understanding consumer intention in online shopping: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 335-345. doi: 10.1080/01449290701850111 Go to original source...
    5. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004) Measuring Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31-47. Go to original source...
    6. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003) The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success: A Ten-year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003 Go to original source...
    7. Ding, J.-F. (2013) Applying an Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Method to Select Hub Location for Global Shipping Carrier-based Logistics Service Providers. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 10(2), 47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010 Go to original source...
    8. Duggan, E. W., & Reichgelt, H. (2006) Measuring information systems delivery quality. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing. doi: 10.2307/249419 Go to original source...
    9. Ergu, D., Kou, G., Peng, Y., Shi, Y., & Shi, Y. (2011) The analytic hierarchy process: task scheduling and resource allocation in cloud computing environment. The Journal of Supercomputing, 59(1), 1 14. doi: 10.1007/s11227-011-0625-1 Go to original source...
    10. Forman, E. H., & Saul, I. G. (2001) The Analytical Hierarchy Process - An Exposition. Operations Research, 49(4), 469-487. Go to original source...
    11. Hočevar, B., & Jaklič, J. (2010) Assessing benefits of Business Intelligence systems - A case study. Management, 15(1), 87-119.
    12. Kaiser, H. F. (1958) The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187 200. doi: 10.1007/BF02289233 Go to original source...
    13. Kampf, R. (2003) Estimation Methods for Weight Criteria. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice: Series B - The Jan Perner Transport Faculty, 9, 255-261.
    14. Karaarslan, N., & Gundogar, E. (2008) An application for modular capability-based ERP software selection using AHP method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 42(9-10), 1025 1033. doi: 10.1007/s00170-008-1522-5 Go to original source...
    15. Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005) Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199-235. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823 Go to original source...
    16. Razavi, M., Aliee, F. S., & Badie, K. (2010) An AHP-based approach toward enterprise architecture analysis based on enterprise architecture quality attributes. Knowledge and Information Systems, 28(2), 449-472. doi: 10.1007/s10115-010-0312-1 Go to original source...
    17. Saaty, T. L. (2005) Analytic Hierarchy Process. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Willey. doi: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002 Go to original source...
    18. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2001) The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 34. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_2 Go to original source...
    19. Saaty, T. L. (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operations Research, 48(1), 9-26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I Go to original source...
    20. Shin, B. (2003) An Exploratory Investigation of System Success Factors in Data Warehousing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 141-170. doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-861 Go to original source...
    21. Stair, R. M., & Reynolds, G. W. (2010) Information Systems Essentials, 5th ed. Boston: Course Technology.
    22. Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., Liang, T-P., & Sharda, R. (2007) Decision support and Business Intelligence systems, 8th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    23. Voola, P., & Babu, A. V. (2013) Comparison of Requirements Prioritization Techniques Employing Different Scales of Measurement. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 38(4), 1-10. doi: 10.1145/2492248.2492278 Go to original source...
    24. Wei, C.-C. (2007) Evaluating the performance of an ERP system based on the knowledge of ERP implementation objectives. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(1-2), 168-181. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1189-3 Go to original source...
    25. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85 102. doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0042 Go to original source...
    26. Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2006) Measuring KMS Access: A Respecification of the DeLone and McLean's Model. Information & Management, 43, 728-739. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002 Go to original source...
    27. Yeoh, W. (2010) Critical Success Factors for Business Intelligence Systems - Case studies in Engineering Enterprises. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content