Acta Informatica Pragensia 2017, 6(2), 174-187 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.1082849

Analýza výsledkov prieskumu vnímania prínosov podporného e-learningové vzdelávania univerzitných študentov

Michal Stričík, Monika Čonková
Department of Economics, Faculty of Business Economics with seat in Košice, University of Economics in Bratislava, Tajovského 13, 041 30 Košice, Slovak Republic

Príspevok sa zaoberá analýzou odpovedí z dotazníkového prieskumu o e-learningovom systéme využívanom na Podnikovohospodárskej fakulte Ekonomickej univerzity v Bratislave so sídlom v Košiciach, využívanom na fakulte v Košiciach a pracovisku v Michalovciach. Výsledky prieskumu poukazujú na skutočnosť, že respondenti oceňujú pri využívaní e-learningovej formy vzdelávania oproti jeho klasickej forme dostupnosť študijných materiálov na internete (78 % respondentov) a možnosť štúdia v ľubovoľnom čase (64 % respondentov). Časť prieskumu bola zameraná na analýzu oblastí, v ktorých študenti zaznamenali na základe práce s e-learningovým systémom zlepšenie svojich zručností a vedomostí. Zlepšenie pociťovali respondenti predovšetkým v odbornej oblasti v rámci jednotlivých predmetov, komunikačnej oblasti a oblasti informatiky. V rámci sledovaného e-learningového vzdelávania videli respondenti predovšetkým priestor na zlepšenie v súvislosti s rozšírením obsahu e-learningového portálu, napríklad o zverejňovanie prednášok, väčšieho množstva a skladby študijných materiálov, pričom požadovali zaradenie ďalších predmetov do systému. Správne využívanie e-learningového vzdelávania pomôže vzdelávacím inštitúciám efektívnejšie a účinnejšie zvyšovať kvalitu a konkurencieschopnosť poskytovania vzdelania, a tým zvyšovať vzdelanostnú úroveň, spokojnosť študentov a plniť záväzky voči spoločnosti.

Keywords: E-learning, blended learning, kvalita vo vzdelávaní, samovzdelávanie, dotazník

Analysis of the Survey Results About University Students' Perception of Benefits of Supporting E-Learning Education

The paper deals with the analysis of the answers to the results of the questionnaire survey on the e-learning system used at the Faculty of Business Economics of the University of Economics in Bratislava with seat in Košice, used at the Faculty in Košice and the workplace in Michalovce. The results of the survey point to the fact that respondents appreciate the use of e-learning form of education compared to its classical form (78 % of respondents) and the possibility of studying at any time (64 % of respondents). Part of the survey was focused on the analysis of the areas in which students have learned to improve their skills and knowledge on the basis of working with the e-learning system. Improvements were felt by respondents mainly in the field of the subject, communication area and informatics. As part of e-learning, respondents particularly saw room for improvement in expanding the e-learning portal content, for example, by lectures, more volumes, and by compilation of study materials requiring inclusion of other subjects into the system. Proper use of e-learning education will help to increase the quality and competitiveness of the provision of education more effectively, thereby increasing the satisfaction of students and meeting their commitments to society.

Keywords: E-learning, Blended learning, Quality in education, Self-education, Questionnaire

Received: March 28, 2017; Revised: August 25, 2017; Accepted: September 15, 2017; Published: December 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stričík, M., & Čonková, M. (2017). Analysis of the Survey Results About University Students' Perception of Benefits of Supporting E-Learning Education. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 6(2), 174-187. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.108
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Al-Samarraie, H., Selim, H., Teo, T., & Zaqout, F. (2017). Isolation and distinctiveness in the design of e-learning systems influence user preferences. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 452 466. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1138313 Go to original source...
    2. Asunka, S. (2017). "We Had a Blast!": An Empirical Affirmation of Blended Learning as the Preferred Learning Mode for Adult Learners. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 9(3), 37-53. doi: 10.4018/IJMBL.2017070104 Go to original source...
    3. Čonková, M., & Stričík, M. (2010). Analýza záujmu študentov o e-learningové vzdelávanie na Podnikovohospodárskej fakulte EU v Košiciach. In Kvalita vzdelávacieho procesu v rámci vysokého školstva SR - Systém manažérstva kvality v školstve (pp. 100-107). Štrba: Podnikovohospodárska fakulta EU so sídlom v Košiciach.
    4. Eagleton, S. (2017). Designing blended learning interventions for the 21st century student. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(2), 203-211. doi: 10.1152/advan.00149.2016 Go to original source...
    5. Fearon, C., Starr, S., & McLaughlin, H. (2012). Blended learning in higher education (HE): Conceptualising key strategic issues within a business school. Development and Learning in Organizations, 26(2), 19-22. doi: 10.1108/14777281211201196 Go to original source...
    6. Galy, E., Downey, C., & Johnson, J. (2011). The effect of using e-learning tools in online and campus-based classrooms on student performance. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10 (1), 209-230. doi: 10.28945/1503 Go to original source...
    7. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), pp. 95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 Go to original source...
    8. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2012). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Go to original source...
    9. Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., Tari, A., & Ladjailia, A. (2016). Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051 Go to original source...
    10. Changchit, C., & Klaus, T. (2012). Technological improvements on classroom community and the increasing acceptance of distance learning courses. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 11(4), 404-414. doi: 10.1504/IJIL.2012.047140 Go to original source...
    11. Chew, E., Jones, N., & Turner, D. (2008). Critical review of the blended learning models based on Maslow's and Vygotsky's educational theory. In International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Education (pp. 40-53). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7_4 Go to original source...
    12. Kafková, E., & Stričík, M. (2010). Aplikácia e-learningu na PHF EU v Bratislave so sídlom v Košiciach ako reakcia na výzvu Bolonského procesu. Mižnarodnij naukovij visnik: Perspektivni naprjami i sposobi realizaciji innovacijnich technologij u sistemi evropejskoj viščoj osviti (pp. 168 175). Užgorod: Zakarpatskij deržavnij universitet.
    13. Khoroshko, L.L., Vikulin, M.A., & Kvashnin, V.M. (2017). Technologies for the development of interactive training courses through the example of LMS MOODLE. In International Conference on Smart Education and Smart E-Learning (pp. 302-309). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_30 Go to original source...
    14. Kimiloglu, H., Ozturan, M., & Kutlu, B. (2017). Perceptions about and attitude toward the usage of e learning in corporate training. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 339-349. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.062 Go to original source...
    15. Kollár, V., Brokeš, P., Wilhalm, I., & Stričík, M. (2007). Metodika tvorby učebných materiálov a vyučovanie pomocou programu Moodle. Michalovce: Nadácia profesora Čolláka Michalovce.
    16. Kuncová, M., & Vojáčková, H. (2015). Analysis of the dependence of the e-learning usage on the study results. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 8(1), 24-34. doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2015.080104 Go to original source...
    17. Kunstová, R. (2012). Analysis of study results and the use of e-learning materials within distance education. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 5(4), 185-194. Go to original source...
    18. doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2012.050401 Go to original source...
    19. Lyamin, A.V., Cherepovskaya, E.N., & Chezhin, M.S. (2017). An outcome-based framework for developing learning trajectories. In International Conference on Smart Education and Smart E Learning (pp. 129-142). Springer: Berlin. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_14 Go to original source...
    20. Mildeová, S. (2004). Creating Business Flight Simulators for Education. In Proceedings of the Conference Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, 2004 (pp. 253-265). Linz: Trauner Verlag universitat.
    21. Olexová, C. (2010). Moderné metódy vzdelávania zamestnancov. In Personálny a mzdový poradca podnikateľa (pp. 406-412). Žilina: Poradca podnikateľa.
    22. Olexová, C. (2011) Riadenie ľudských zdrojov praktikum. Bratislava: Ekonóm.
    23. Pinto-Llorente, A.M., Sánchez-Gómez, M.C., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2017). Students' perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended learning training to improve grammatical competence in English as a second language. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 632-643. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.071 Go to original source...
    24. Robertson, J.S., Grant, M.M., & Jackson, L. (2005). Is online instruction perceived as effective as campus instruction by graduate students in education? Internet and Higher Education, 8 (1), 73 86. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.004 Go to original source...
    25. Stričík, M., Polák, M., & Meheš, M. (2008). Nové trendy v oblasti vzdelávania na Podnikovohospodárskej fakulte Ekonomickej univerzity v Bratislave. In Mižnarodnij naukovij visnik: Lisabonska strategija jak viznačaľnij činnik evropejskoj integraciji v galuzi osviti i nauki (pp. 62-71). Užgorod: Lira.
    26. Suanpang, P., Petocz, P., & Kalceff, W. (2004). Student attitudes to learning business statistics: Comparison of online and traditional methods. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3).
    27. Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17 28. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content