Acta Informatica Pragensia 2024, 13(1), 100-113 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.2313807

Understanding Consumer Perceptions About Smartwatches: Feature Extraction and Opinion Mining Using Supervised Learning Algorithm

Dhanya Manayath ORCID...1, Sanju Kaladharan ORCID...1, Nikita Venal Soman1, Abith Vijayakumaran2
1 Amrita School of Business, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (Deemed to be University), Kochi, India
2 Conestoga College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Kitchener, Canada

Against the backdrop of increasing smartwatch usage and the dynamic landscape of evolving features, a nuanced understanding of consumer opinions and preferences is vital for tailoring features and crafting effective marketing strategies. This study addresses this imperative by conducting a comprehensive analysis of customer reviews on smartwatches, aiming to determine the pivotal factors guiding consumer purchasing decisions. By employing word clouds to visually represent sentiments, the study uncovers notable trends. Positive reviews prominently highlight the term “quality”, suggesting a strong emphasis on product excellence. In contrast, negative reviews were characterized by the prevalence of the term “fake”, indicating concerns related to authenticity. Additionally, a comparative assessment of two machine learning algorithms, namely support vector machines and Naive Bayes, demonstrates that support vector machines exhibit superior accuracy in classification. These findings offer valuable insights for industry practitioners navigating the competitive landscape of the smartwatch market, providing actionable information for optimizing product features and refining marketing strategies to meet consumer expectations.

Keywords: Healthcare 5.0; Sentiment analysis; Opinion mining; Supervised learning algorithms; Wearable technology.

Received: November 16, 2023; Revised: February 27, 2024; Accepted: March 2, 2024; Prepublished online: April 13, 2024; Published: April 15, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Manayath, D., Kaladharan, S., Soman, N.V., & Vijayakumaran, A. (2024). Understanding Consumer Perceptions About Smartwatches: Feature Extraction and Opinion Mining Using Supervised Learning Algorithm. Acta Informatica Pragensia13(1), 100-113. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.231
Download citation

References

  1. Al-Maroof, R. S., Alhumaid, K., Alhamad, A. Q., Aburayya, A., & Salloum, S. (2021). User Acceptance of Smart Watch for Medical Purposes: An Empirical Study. Future Internet, 13(5), Article 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/FI13050127 Go to original source...
  2. Almarzouqi, A., Aburayya, A., & Salloum, S. A. (2022). Determinants of intention to use medical smartwatch-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 28, 100859. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IMU.2022.100859 Go to original source...
  3. Almheiri, E., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., & Arpaci, I. (2024). Drivers of smartwatch use and its effect on environmental sustainability: evidence from SEM-ANN approach. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-10-2023-0490 Go to original source...
  4. Basha, S. M., & Rajput, D. S. (2019). An innovative topic-based customer complaints sentiment classification system. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 20(3), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2019.102718 Go to original source...
  5. Bieber, G., Haescher, M., & Vahl, M. (2013). Sensor requirements for activity recognition on smart watches. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (paper no. 67). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2504335.2504407 Go to original source...
  6. Bird, S. (2006). NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions, (pp. 69-72). ACM. https://doi.org/10.3115/1225403.1225421 Go to original source...
  7. Bölen, M. C. (2020). From traditional wristwatch to smartwatch: Understanding the relationship between innovation attributes, switching costs and consumers' switching intention. Technology in Society, 63, 101439. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2020.101439 Go to original source...
  8. Cambria, E., & White, B. (2014). Jumping NLP curves: A review of natural language processing research. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 9(2), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2014.2307227 Go to original source...
  9. Chamlertwat, W., Bhattarakosol, P., Rungkasiri, T., & Haruechaiyasak, C. (2012). Discovering Consumer Insight from Twitter via Sentiment Analysis. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(8), 973-992.
  10. Chandel, R. S., Sharma, S., Kaur, S., Singh, S., & Kumar, R. (2022). Smart watches: A review of evolution in bio-medical sector. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 1053-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.07.460 Go to original source...
  11. Chaturvedi, I., Cambria, E., Welsch, R. E., & Herrera, F. (2018). Distinguishing between facts and opinions for sentiment analysis: Survey and challenges. Information Fusion, 44, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFFUS.2017.12.006 Go to original source...
  12. Chuah, S. H. W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.07.047 Go to original source...
  13. Elnagar, A., Alnazzawi, N., Afyouni, I., Shahin, I., Bou Nassif, A., & Salloum, S. A. (2022). Prediction of the intention to use a smartwatch: A comparative approach using machine learning and partial least squares structural equation modeling. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 29, 100913. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IMU.2022.100913 Go to original source...
  14. Gamal, D., Alfonse, M., M. El-Horbaty, E.-S., & M. Salem, A.-B. (2018). Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Opinion Mining in Different Domains. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 1(1), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.3390/make1010014 Go to original source...
  15. Ha, T., Beijnon, B., Kim, S., Lee, S., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Examining user perceptions of smartwatch through dynamic topic modeling. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1262-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2017.05.011 Go to original source...
  16. Jain, A. P., & Dandannavar, P. (2016). Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Sentiment Analysis. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATCCT.2016.7912076 Go to original source...
  17. Jain, P. K., Pamula, R., & Srivastava, G. (2021). A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for consumer sentiment analysis using online reviews. Computer Science Review, 41, 100413. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSREV.2021.100413 Go to original source...
  18. Jin, X., Li, L., Dang, F., Chen, X., & Liu, Y. (2022). A survey on edge computing for wearable technology. Digital Signal Processing, 125, 103146. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSP.2021.103146 Go to original source...
  19. Jung, Y., Kim, S., & Choi, B. (2016). Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 899-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.06.040 Go to original source...
  20. Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527-541. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2014-0126 Go to original source...
  21. Laksono, R. A., Sungkono, K. R., Sarno, R., & Wahyuni, C. S. (2019). Sentiment Analysis of Restaurant Customer Reviews on TripAdvisor using Naive Bayes. In Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and Systems. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS.2019.8850982 Go to original source...
  22. Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02145-9 Go to original source...
  23. Loper, E., & Bird, S. (2002). NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit. arXiv preprint cs/0205028. Go to original source...
  24. Mbunge, E., Muchemwa, B., Jiyane, S., & Batani, J. (2021). Sensors and healthcare 5.0: transformative shift in virtual care through emerging digital health technologies. Global Health Journal, 5(4), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOHJ.2021.11.008 Go to original source...
  25. Misra, S., Adtani, R., Singh, Y., Singh, S., & Thakkar, D. (2023). Exploring the factors affecting behavioral intention to adopt wearable devices. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 24, 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101428 Go to original source...
  26. Nasukawa, T., & Yi, J. (2003). Sentiment Analysis: Capturing Favorability Using Natural Language Processing. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture (pp. 70-77). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/945645.945658 Go to original source...
  27. Park, Y. W., Son, S., & Kim, B. (2016). Is smartwatch perceived as a wristwatch or a wearable device? The experimental study for examining the categorization and the perceived fit with manufacturer on consumer evaluations. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce: e-Commerce in Smart connected World. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971603.2971624 Go to original source...
  28. Putri, D. A., Kristiyanti, D. A., Indrayuni, E., Nurhadi, A., & Hadinata, D. R. (2020). Comparison of Naive Bayes Algorithm and Support Vector Machine using PSO Feature Selection for Sentiment Analysis on E-Wallet Review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1641(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1641/1/012085 Go to original source...
  29. Qazi, A., Raj, R. G., Hardaker, G., & Standing, C. (2017). A systematic literature review on opinion types and sentiment analysis techniques: Tasks and challenges. Internet Research, 27(3), 608-630. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-04-2016-0086 Go to original source...
  30. Rahat, A. M., Kahir, A., & Masum, A. K. M. (2019). Comparison of Naive Bayes and SVM Algorithm based on Sentiment Analysis Using Review Dataset. In 2019 8th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends, (pp. 266-270). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART46866.2019.9117512 Go to original source...
  31. Reeder, B., & David, A. (2016). Health at hand: A systematic review of smart watch uses for health and wellness. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 63, 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBI.2016.09.001 Go to original source...
  32. Salahuddin, M., & Lee, Y. A. (2021). Identifying key quality features for wearable technology embedded products using the Kano model. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 33(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-08-2019-0130 Go to original source...
  33. Sánchez-Franco, M. J., Navarro-García, A., & Rondán-Cataluña, F. J. (2019). A Naive Bayes strategy for classifying customer satisfaction: A study based on online reviews of hospitality services. Journal of Business Research, 101, 499-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.051 Go to original source...
  34. Saraswat, D., Bhattacharya, P., Verma, A., Prasad, V. K., Tanwar, S., Sharma, G., Bokoro, P. N., & Sharma, R. (2022). Explainable AI for Healthcare 5.0: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 84486-84517. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3197671 Go to original source...
  35. Shroff, A., Shah, B. K., Jha, A., Jaiswal, A. K., Sapra, P., & Kumar, M. (2021). Multiplex Regulation System With Personalised Recommendation Using ML. In 2021 5th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (pp. 1567-1573). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI51242.2021.9453005 Go to original source...
  36. Siepmann, C., & Kowalczuk, P. (2021). Understanding continued smartwatch usage: the role of emotional as well as health and fitness factors. Electronic Markets, 31(4), 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12525-021-00458-3 Go to original source...
  37. Srinivasan, R., & Subalalitha, C. N. (2023). Sentimental analysis from imbalanced code-mixed data using machine learning approaches. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 41(1-2), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10619-021-07331-4 Go to original source...
  38. Tandon, V., & Mehra, R. (2023). An Integrated Approach for Analysing Sentiments on Social Media. Informatica (Slovenia), 47(2), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v47i2.4390 Go to original source...
  39. Tripathy, A., Agrawal, A., & Rath, S. K. (2016). Classification of sentiment reviews using n-gram machine learning approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 57, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.028 Go to original source...
  40. Wickramasinghe, I., & Kalutarage, H. (2021). Naive Bayes: applications, variations and vulnerabilities: a review of literature with code snippets for implementation. Soft Computing, 25(3), 2277-2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00500-020-05297-6 Go to original source...
  41. Xu, L., Pan, C., Xu, B., Sun, Z., Zhou, K., Yan, R., Weng, K., Wu, Y., & Li, H. (2024). A Qualitative Exploration of a User-Centered Model for Smartwatch Comfort Using Grounded Theory. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (ahead-of-print), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2313273 Go to original source...
  42. Zhang, Y., & Rau, P. L. P. (2015). Playing with multiple wearable devices: Exploring the influence of display, motion and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.04.004 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.