Acta Informatica Pragensia 2024, 13(3), 395-417 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.2493887

Evaluation of the I-Voting System for Remote Primary Elections of the Czech Pirate Party

Tomáš Martínek ORCID...1, Michal Malý ORCID...2
1 Department of Information Engineering, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Political Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

The integration of digital technologies into political processes represents a pivotal shift in the operational dynamics of political parties, highlighting an evolution from traditional to digital platforms. This transformation offers greater member engagement and decision-making transparency while also introducing new challenges in terms of security and control. This study presents an analytical overview of the Helios voting system as implemented by the Czech Pirate Party, used not only for primary elections, offering a critical examination of its operational framework, security measures, verification processes, and implications for intra-party democracy and member engagement. The Czech Pirate Party's engagement with Helios exemplifies a broader trend toward digitalization within political organizations, reflecting both the potential benefits and inherent challenges of such technological adoption. Drawing on theoretical insights from the literature on political party transformation in the digital age, this article assesses how i-voting systems like Helios can potentially enhance or detract from internal democracy. The discourse around digital platforms is nuanced, revealing opportunities for increased democratic engagement alongside risks of enhanced centralization and control. Empirical data from a survey of the Czech Pirate Party's membership base provides insights into perceptions of the Helios system's usability, security, and its impact on democratic processes within the party. The study further investigates Helios's technical aspects, focusing on its security protocols, verification mechanisms, and governance structures related to data and platform ownership, to understand its implications for electoral integrity and party governance. The research aims to contribute to the dialogue on e-voting platforms, highlighting the need for a careful balance between embracing technological advancements and upholding democratic principles.

Keywords: E-voting; Remote voting; Internet voting; Czech Republic; Primary election; System evaluation; Helios; Open-Source; Standards; Digital Party.

Received: March 21, 2024; Revised: June 13, 2024; Accepted: July 20, 2024; Prepublished online: July 25, 2024; Published: August 22, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Martínek, T., & Malý, M. (2024). Evaluation of the I-Voting System for Remote Primary Elections of the Czech Pirate Party. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 13(3), 395-417. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.249
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acemyan, C. Z., Kortum, P., Byrne, M. D., & Wallach, D. S. (2014). From Error to Error: Why Voters Could not Cast a Ballot and Verify Their Vote With Helios, Prêt à Voter, and Scantegrity II. USENIX Journal of Election Technology and Systems, 2(3), 26-56. https://www.usenix.org/jets/issues/0302/acemyan
    2. Adida, B. (2008). Helios: Web-based Open-Audit Voting. USENIX security symposium, 17, 335-348. https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/sec08/tech/full_papers/adida/adida.pdf
    3. Adida, B., de Marneffe, O., Pereira, O., & Quisquater, J.-J. (2009). Electing a University President using Open-Audit Voting: Analysis of real-world use of Helios. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Electronic Voting Technology/Workshop on Trustworthy Elections. https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/evtwote09/tech/full_papers/adida-helios.pdf
    4. Agbesi, S., Budurushi, J., Dalela, A., & Kulyk, O. (2023). Investigating transparency dimensions for internet voting. In Electronic Voting (pp. 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43756-4_1 Go to original source...
    5. Agora Voting. (2023). NVotes. Democracy Technologies. https://democracy-technologies.org/product/nvotes/
    6. Baloglu, S., Bursuc, S., Mauw, S., & Pang, J. (2021a). Election Verifiability Revisited: Automated Security Proofs and Attacks on Helios and Belenios. In 2021 IEEE 34th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF51468.2021.00019 Go to original source...
    7. Baloglu, S., Bursuc, S., Mauw, S., & Pang, J. (2021b). Provably Improving Election Verifiability in Belenios. In R. Krimmer, M. Volkamer, D. Duenas-Cid, O. Kulyk, P. Rønne, M. Solvak, & M. Germann (Eds.), Electronic Voting (pp. 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_1 Go to original source...
    8. Barrat i Esteve, J. (2022). The Use of Electronic Vote Within the Political Parties. Ideas for democracy. https://www.minsait.com/ideasfordemocracy/en/use-electronic-vote-within-political-parties-full-length-article
    9. Bavdekar, R., Chopde, E. J., Bhatia, A., Tiwari, K., Daniel, S. J., & Atul. (2022). Post Quantum Cryptography: Techniques, Challenges, Standardization, and Directions for Future Research. Arxiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.02826 Go to original source...
    10. Bernhard, D., Cortier, V., Pereira, O., Smyth, B., & Warinschi, B. (2011). Adapting Helios for Provable Ballot Privacy. In V. Atluri & C. Diaz (Eds.), Computer Security - ESORICS 2011, (pp. 335-354). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23822-2_19 Go to original source...
    11. Bernhard, D., Pereira, O., & Warinschi, B. (2012). How Not to Prove Yourself: Pitfalls of the Fiat-Shamir Heuristic and Applications to Helios. In Advances in Cryptology - ASIACRYPT 2012 (pp. 626-643). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34961-4_38 Go to original source...
    12. Beurdouche, B., Bhargavan, K., Delignat-Lavaud, A., Fournet, C., Kohlweiss, M., Pironti, A., Strub, P. -Y., & Zinzindohoue, J. K. (2017). A messy state of the union. Communications of the ACM, 60(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1145/3023357 Go to original source...
    13. Blanchard, E., Gallais, A., Leblond, E., Sidhoum-Rahal, D., & Walter, J. (2022). An Analysis of the Security and Privacy Issues of the Neovote Online Voting System. In R. Krimmer, M. Volkamer, D. Duenas-Cid, P. Rønne, & M. Germann (Eds.), Electronic Voting (pp. 1-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15911-4_1 Go to original source...
    14. Boček, J., Kočí, P., Krawiecová, N., & Zákopčanová, K. (2021). Kandidáti do sněmovny zestárli. 'Transformace stranického systému skončila,' říká politolog. IROZHLAS. https://www.irozhlas.cz/volby/snemovni-volby-2021-interaktivni-kandidatky_2109140634_jab
    15. Brunet, J., & Essex, A. (2023). Online Voting in Ontario Municipalities: A Standards-Based Review. In E-Vote-ID 2023: Electronic Voting (pp. 52-68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43756-4_4 Go to original source...
    16. Cirhan, T., & Stauber, J. (2018). Online supporter and registered sympathiser as alternatives to a regular party member. East European Politics, 34(4), 458-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1532410 Go to original source...
    17. Cortier, V. (2015). Formal verification of e-voting: solutions and challenges. ACM SIGLOG News, 2(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2728816.2728823 Go to original source...
    18. Cortier, V., Gaudry, P., & Glondu, S. (2019). Belenios: A Simple Private and Verifiable Electronic Voting System. In J. D. Guttman, C. E. Landwehr, J. Meseguer, & D. Pavlovic (Eds.), Foundations of Security, Protocols, and Equational Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 214-238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19052-1_14 Go to original source...
    19. Cortier, V., Gaudry, P., & Glondu, S. (2020). Analyse de sécurité de la plateforme de vote Belenios Conformité avec les recommandations 2019 de la CNIL. https://www.belenios.org/analyse-secu.pdf
    20. Council of Europe. (2017). Recommendation CM/Rec(2017)5 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on standards for e-voting: (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 June 2017 at the 1289th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies). https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680726f6f
    21. Czech Republic. (2024). Zákon č. 424/1991 Sb.: Zákon o sdružování v politických stranách a v politických hnutích. https://www.e-sbirka.cz/sb/1991/424?zalozka=text
    22. Czech Republic. (1995). Zákon č. 247/1995 Sb.: Zákon o volbách do Parlamentu České republiky a o změně a doplnění některých dalších zákonů. https://www.e-sbirka.cz/sb/1995/247/2021-07-01
    23. Deseriis, M. (2017). Direct Parliamentarianism: an analysis of the political values embedded in Rousseau, the 'Operating system' of the Five star movement. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 9(2), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v9i2.471 Go to original source...
    24. Deseriis, M. (2023). Reducing the Burden of Decision in Digital Democracy Applications: A Comparative Analysis of Six Decision-making Software. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 48(2), 401-427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211054081 Go to original source...
    25. Deseriis, M. (2021). Rethinking the digital democratic affordance and its impact on political representation: Toward a new framework. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2452-2473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929678 Go to original source...
    26. Deseriis, M., & Vittori, D. (2019). The Impact of Online Participation Platforms on the Internal Democracy of Two Southern European Parties: Podemos and the Five Star Movement. International Journal of Communication, 13(1), 5695-5714.
    27. Essex, A., & Goodman, N. (2020). Protecting electoral integrity in the digital age: Developing E-Voting regulations in Canada. Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy, 19(2), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2019.0568 Go to original source...
    28. Fitzpatrick, J., & Jöst, P. (2022). "The High Mass of Democracy" -Why Germany remains aloof to the idea of electronic voting. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 876476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.876476 Go to original source...
    29. Garnett, H. A., & James, T. S. (2020). Cyber Elections in the Digital Age: Threats and Opportunities of technology for electoral integrity. Election Law Journal, 19(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2020.0633 Go to original source...
    30. Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The Digital Party Political Organisation and Online Democracy. Pluto Press. Go to original source...
    31. Haines, T., Mosaheb, R., Müller, J., & Pryvalov, I. (2023). SoK: Secure E-Voting with Everlasting Privacy. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2023(1), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2023-0017 Go to original source...
    32. Husarová, L., & Hromádka, M. (2012). John obhájil v internetovém hlasování pozici předsedy Věcí veřejných. IROZHLAS. https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-domov/john-obhajil-v-internetovem-hlasovani-pozici-predsedy-veci-verejnych_201206202001_mhromadka
    33. Jebavá, J., & Masare, V. (2020). Pražské Zelené nově povede Jana Jebavá a Vít Masare. Zelení. https://praha.zeleni.cz/prazske-zelene-nove-povede-jana-jebava-a-vit-masare/
    34. Kopecký, J. (2010). Hlasování véčkařů o vládě musela strana zastavit. Ukazovalo se jen ANO. IDNES.cz. https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/domaci/hlasovani-veckaru-o-vlade-musela-strana-zastavit-ukazovalo-se-jen-ano.A100709_123617_domaci_kop
    35. La Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés. (2019). Délibération n° 2019-053 du 25 avril 2019 portant adoption d'une recommandation relative à la sécurité des systèmes de vote par correspondance électronique, notamment via Internet: NOR: CNIL1917529X. Légifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000038661239
    36. Lanzone, M. E., & Rombi, S. (2018). Selecting Candidates Online in Europe: A Comparison Among the Cases of M5S, Podemos and European Green Party. In G. Cordero & X. Coller (Eds.), Democratizing Candidate Selection, (pp. 99-121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76550-1_5 Go to original source...
    37. Lee Rodgers, J., & Nicewander, W. A. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1988.10475524 Go to original source...
    38. Lupato, F. G., & Meloni, M. (2023). Digital Intra-Party Democracy: An Exploratory Analysis of Podemos and the Labour Party. Parliamentary Affairs, 76(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsab015 Go to original source...
    39. Marcos del Blanco, D. Y., Duenas-Cid, D., & Aláiz Moretón, H. (2020). E-Voting System Evaluation Based on the Council of Europe Recommendations: nVotes. In R. Krimmer, M. Volkamer, B. Beckert, R. Küsters, O. Kulyk, D. Duenas-Cid, & M. Solvak (Eds.), Electronic Voting (pp. 147-166). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60347-2_10 Go to original source...
    40. Marcos del Blanco, D. Y., & Gascó, M. (2019). A Protocolized, Comparative Study of Helios Voting and Scytl/iVote. In 2019 Sixth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG), (pp. 31-38). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2019.8734351 Go to original source...
    41. Marky, K., Zollinger, M., Roenne, P., Ryan, P. Y. A., Grube, T., & Kunze, K. (2021). Investigating usability and user experience of individually verifiable internet voting schemes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 28(5), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459604 Go to original source...
    42. Martínek, T., & Forýtek, L. (2022). The highly secure anonymous e-voting system of the Czech Pirate Party. In R. Krimmer, M. Volkamer, D. Duenas-Cid, M. Germann, S. Glondu, T. Hofer, I. Krivonosova, B. Martin-Rozumlowicz, P. Rønne, & M. -L. Zollinger (Eds.), E-Vote-ID 2022: Seventh Joint International Conference on Electronic Voting, (pp. 165-168). University of Tartu Press. https://doi.org/10.15157/diss/036 Go to original source...
    43. Martínek, T., & Malý, M. (2024). Questionnaire survey among members of the Czech Pirate Party regarding the use of the online voting system Helios. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10829926 Go to original source...
    44. Mikola, B. (2017). Online primaries and intra-party democracy: Candidate selection processes in Podemos and the Five Star Movement: Candidate selection processes in Podemos and the Five Star Movement. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, (24), 37-49. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/788/78850913004.pdf Go to original source...
    45. Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2010). Applied statistics and probability for engineers. John wiley.
    46. Mortkowitz, S. (2019). Czech Pirates, ahoy!. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/czech-pirate-party-anti-establishment-ivan-bartos-ahoy/
    47. Mosca, L. (2020). Democratic vision and online participatory spaces in the Italian Movimento 5 Stelle. Acta Politica, 55(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0096-y Go to original source...
    48. Musella, F. (2023). How a left-wing political party fails to keep up with the times. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 28(5), 585-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571x.2023.2255060 Go to original source...
    49. Neovote. (2024). Elections politiques. Neovote. https://www.neovote.com/scrutins_specifiques/scrutins-politiques
    50. Nurse, J. R. C., Agrafiotis, I., Erola, A., Bada, M., Roberts, T., Williams, M., Goldsmith, M., & Creese, S. (2017). An Assessment of the Security and Transparency Procedural Components of the Estonian Internet Voting System. In Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust (pp. 366-383). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58460-7_26 Go to original source...
    51. Panizo Alonso, L., Gascó, M., Marcos del Blanco, D. Y., Alonso, J. Á. H., Barrat, J., & Moreton, H. A. (2018). E-Voting System Evaluation Based on The Council of Europe Recommendations: Helios Voting. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 9(1), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2018.2881891 Go to original source...
    52. Pearson, K. (1895). VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58, 240-242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041 Go to original source...
    53. Pereira, O. (2016). Internet voting with Helios. In Real-World Electronic Voting: Design, Analysis and Deployment. CRC Press.
    54. Pink, M., & Folvarčný, A. (2020). The Czech Pirate Party: A New Alternative, Not Only for the Young. Intersections, 6(4), 176-196. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v6i4.610 Go to original source...
    55. Pirates. (2022). Ochrana osobních údajů. Pirati.cz. https://www.pirati.cz/ochrana-osobnich-udaju/
    56. Raniolo, F., & Tarditi, V. (2020). Digital revolution and party innovations: An analysis of the Spanish case. Italian Political Science Review, 50, 235-253). https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2019.27 Go to original source...
    57. Rodríguez-Pérez, A. (2022). The Council of Europe's CM/Rec(2017)5 on e-voting and Secret Suffrage: Time for yet Another Update? In R. Krimmer, M. Volkamer, D. Duenas-Cid, P. Rønne, & M. Germann (Eds.), Electronic Voting (pp. 90-105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15911-4_6 Go to original source...
    58. Sako, K., & Kilian, J. (1995). Receipt-Free Mix-Type Voting Scheme. In Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT '95 (pp. 393-403). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49264-X_32 Go to original source...
    59. Solop, F. I. (2001). Digital democracy comes of age: internet voting and the 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary election. Political Science & Politics, 34(02), 289-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909650100052x Go to original source...
    60. Šárovec, D. (2022). Digitalization of the Digitalized Ones: The Czech Pirate Party and its Online Congresses. European Consortium for Political Research. https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/64060
    61. Šárovec, D. (2019). Assured Newcomers on a Squally Sea? The Czech Pirate Party before and after the 2017 Elections. Acta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni, 11(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.24132/actaff.2019.11.2.1 Go to original source...
    62. TOP 09. (2024). Tajné elektronické volby. https://www.top09.cz/files/soubory/tajne-elektronicke-volby-navod_980.pdf
    63. TOP 09. (2011). Delegáti sněmu TOP 09 si budou volit vedení elektronicky, ve stanu. TOP 09. https://www.top09.cz/co-delame/medialni-vystupy/delegati-snemu-top-09-si-budou-volit-vedeni-elektronicky-ve-stanu-7369.html
    64. Transparency International. (2014). Masová manipulace u voleb potvrzena. Transparency.cz. https://www.transparency.cz/masova-manipulace-u-voleb-potvrzena/
    65. U.S. Vote Foundation. (2015). E2E-VIV Project: The Future of Voting: End-to-End Verifiable Internet Voting - Specification and Feasibility Study. U.S. Vote Foundation. https://www.usvotefoundation.org/E2E-VIV
    66. Vittori, D. (2019). Membership and members' participation in new digital parties: Bring back the people? Comparative European Politics, 18(12), 609-629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00201-5 Go to original source...
    67. Vodová, P., & Voda, P. (2020). The effects of deliberation in Czech Pirate Party: The case of coalition formation in Brno (2018). European Political Science, 19(2), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-019-00233-1 Go to original source...
    68. von Nostitz, F., & Sandri, G. (2021). I-Voting Regulation Within Digital Parties: The Case of Podemos and Five Stars Movement. In O. Barberà, G. Sandri, P. Correa, & J. Rodríguez-Teruel (Eds.), Digital Parties (pp. 85-107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78668-7_5 Go to original source...
    69. von Nostitz, F., Sandri, G., & Esteve, J. B. (2021). Regulating i-Voting Within Countries and Parties. In O. Barberà, G. Sandri, P. Correa, & J. Rodríguez-Teruel (Eds.), Digital Parties (pp. 43-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78668-7_3 Go to original source...
    70. Wack, J. (2014). IEEE VSSC/1622: Voting System Standards. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=916378 Go to original source...
    71. Wolchok, S., Wustrow, E., Isabel, D., & Halderman, J. A. (2012). Attacking the Washington, D.C. Internet Voting System. In 16th Conference on Financial Cryptography & Data Security (pp. 114-128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32946-3_10 Go to original source...
    72. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. (2023). Zásady přístupnosti. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-principles/cs

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content