Acta Informatica Pragensia 2024, 13(3), 433-459 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.2373598

Information Ethics in Light of Bibliometric Analyses: Discovering a Shift to Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

Jela Steinerová ORCID..., Miriam Ondrišová ORCID...
Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia

The objectives of this study are to analyse the content of publications focused on the area of information ethics and discover patterns, knowledge and thematic trends. The main research question is: What is the intellectual and topical structure of the field of information ethics? We apply bibliometric analytical methods, including co-citation analysis (41 most cited authors out of 9947), co-word analysis (127 keywords), visualizations (maps) and analysis of time periods in strategic diagrams. These methods are interpreted with the use of previous content analyses and results of a Delphi study. The dataset covers publications between 1988 and 2023 collected from Web of Science using the search term “information ethics” in titles, keywords and abstracts (469 records). The study presents the research background and objectives, related research review, research methods and findings. Results are visualized in maps of topics and trends. We investigate the intellectual and thematic structure of information ethics, including numbers of publications, main disciplines, the intellectual structure (authors, topics, trends) and identify four time periods (1988-2005, 2006-2012, 2013-2019, 2020-2023) visualized by strategic diagrams. The study reveals the multidimensionality and multidisciplinary dynamic evolution of information ethics. The main trends are the topics of ethics of artificial intelligence and algorithms, data ethics, ethics of information literacy, informational privacy and dis/misinformation. We find that information ethics studies are embedded in wider contexts of the information crisis and design of public digital services. We propose education and information literacy courses related to ethical sensitivity, data ethics and the use of AI tools. The study contributes to bridging the gap between information ethics studies and human information interactions. Our results confirm the increasing interest in ethics of artificial intelligence.

Keywords: Information ethics; Bibliometric analyses; Trends in publishing; Ethics of artificial intelligence.

Received: February 19, 2024; Revised: April 15, 2024; Accepted: May 20, 2024; Prepublished online: July 20, 2024; Published: August 22, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Steinerová, J., & Ondrišová, M. (2024). Information Ethics in Light of Bibliometric Analyses: Discovering a Shift to Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 13(3), 433-459. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.237
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ACRL. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Ala.org. Retrieved from https://alair.ala.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7d1835a5-b616-4f1c-9fbe-ef7761d5171f/content
    2. Agarwal, N. K. (2022). Exploring context in information behavior: Seeker, situation, surroundings, and shared identities. Springer Nature.
    3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 Go to original source...
    4. Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2022). Introduction to information science. Facet Publishing. Go to original source...
    5. Bielby, J., & Kelly, M. (2016). Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro. In M. Kelly & J. Bielby (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age (pp. 1-28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_1 Go to original source...
    6. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 2-72. https://doi.org/10/fs6fjb Go to original source...
    7. Buchanan, E. A., & Henderson, K. A. (2008). Case Studies in Library and Information Science Ethics. McFarland & Company.
    8. Burgess, J. T., & Knox, E. J. (2019). Foundations of information ethics. American Library Association.
    9. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280 Go to original source...
    10. Capurro, R. (2005). Information Ethics. CSI Communications, 28(12), 7-10. Go to original source...
    11. Capurro, R. (2008). On Floridi's metaphysical foundation of information ecology. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2-3), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9162-x Go to original source...
    12. Capurro, R. (2019). Ethical Issues of Humanoid-Human Interaction. Humanoid Robotics: A Reference. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_127 Go to original source...
    13. Clarivate. (2022). KeyWords Plus generation, creation, and changes. Retrieved from https://support.clarivate.com/s/article/KeyWords-Plus-generation-creation-and-changes?language=en_US
    14. Davenport, T. H. (2018). The AI Advantage: How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work. MIT Press. Go to original source...
    15. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 Go to original source...
    16. Eom, S. B. (2008). Author Cocitation Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Mapping the Intellectual Structure of an Academic Discipline: Quantitative Methods for Mapping the Intellectual Structure of an Academic Discipline. IGI Global. Go to original source...
    17. Ess, C. (2008). Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information and information ethics: Critical reflections and the state of the art. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2-3), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9172-8 Go to original source...
    18. Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, O. (2017). Incorporating Ethics into Artificial Intelligence. The Journal of Ethics, 21(4), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-017-9252-2 Go to original source...
    19. Fallis, D. (2007). Information ethics for twenty-first century library professionals. Library Hi Tech, 25(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830710735830 Go to original source...
    20. Floridi, L. (2008). Information ethics: a reappraisal. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2-3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9176-4 Go to original source...
    21. Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    22. Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of information. Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    23. Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics, the governance of the digital and the General Data Protection Regulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0081 Go to original source...
    24. Floridi, L. (2019). The Logic of Information: A theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design. Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    25. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. In Machine Learning and the City (pp. 535-545). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch45 Go to original source...
    26. Floridi, L. (2020). Artificial Intelligence as a Public Service: Learning from Amsterdam and Helsinki. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 541-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00434-3 Go to original source...
    27. Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360 Go to original source...
    28. Floridi, L. (2023a). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Challenges and Opportunities. Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    29. Floridi, L. (2023b). AI as Agency Without Intelligence: On ChatGPT, Large Language Models, and Other Generative Models. Philosophy & Technology, 36(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y Go to original source...
    30. Forster, M. (2013). Information literacy as a facilitator of ethical practice in the professions. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.11645/7.1.1783 Go to original source...
    31. Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. G. (2019). Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. MIT Press. Go to original source...
    32. Froehlich, R. (2004). Information Ethics. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences (pp. 256-258). Taylor and Francis.
    33. Fuchs, C. (2016). Information Ethics in the Age of Digital Labour and the Surveillance-Industrial Complex. In M. Kelly & J. Bielby (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro (pp. 173-190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_10 Go to original source...
    34. Gorichanaz, T. (2017). Information and experience, a dialogue. Journal of Documentation, 73(3), 500-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2016-0114 Go to original source...
    35. Gorichanaz, T. (2020). Information Experience in Theory and Design. Emerald. Go to original source...
    36. Gorichanaz, T. (2023). Accused: How students respond to allegations of using ChatGPT on assessments. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2254787 Go to original source...
    37. González-Valiente, C. L., Costas, R., Noyons, E., Steinerová, J., & Šušol, J. (2020). Terminological (di) Similarities between Information Management and Knowledge Management: a Term Co-Occurrence Analysis. Journal on Special Topics in Mobile Networks and Applications/Mobile Networks and Applications, 26(1), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01643-y Go to original source...
    38. Graff, K., Quiñonez-Riegos, G., Scott, J., & Senior, H. (2020). Ethical Issues in Academic Libraries: An Annotated Bibliography. Journal of Information Ethics, 29(1), 65-88.
    39. Hagendorff, T. (2020). The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30, 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8 Go to original source...
    40. Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2022). Paradoxes of Media and Information Literacy: The Crisis of Information. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163237 Go to original source...
    41. Haider, J. & Sunsin, O. (2019). Invisible Search and Online Search Engines. The Ubiquity of Search in Everyday Life. Routledge. Go to original source...
    42. Hauptman, R. (1988). Ethical challenges in librarianship. Onyx Press.
    43. Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J., & van den Berg, J. (2011). Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9273-7 Go to original source...
    44. Hicks, A., McKinney, P., Inskip, C., Walton, G., & Lloyd, A. (2023). Leveraging information literacy: Mapping the conceptual influence and appropriation of information literacy in other disciplinary landscapes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(3), 548-566. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221090677 Go to original source...
    45. Ingwersen, P., & Christensen, F. H. (1997). Data set isolation for bibliometric online analyses of research publications: Fundamental methodological issues. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(3), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199703)48:3<205::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-0 Go to original source...
    46. Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (2021). LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0062 Go to original source...
    47. Karlova, N. A., & Fisher, K. E. (2013). A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour. Information Research, 18(1). https://informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper573.html
    48. Kelly, M. and Bielby, J. (eds.) (2016). Information Cultures in the Digital Age. A festschrift in Honour of Rafael Capurro. Springer. Go to original source...
    49. Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Science visualization and discursive knowledge. In Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact, (pp. 167-185). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9445.003.0013 Go to original source...
    50. Lloyd, A. (2021). Qualitative Landscape of Information Literacy Research. Perspectives, Methods and Techniques. Facet. Go to original source...
    51. Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.70949 Go to original source...
    52. MacKey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2019). Metaliterate learning for the post-truth world. ALA.
    53. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6%3C433::AID-ASI11%3E3.0.CO;2-Q Go to original source...
    54. McMenemy, D. (2021). No Longer "Neutral Among Ends" - Liberal Versus Communitarian Ethics in Library and Information Science. In K. Toeppe, H. Yan, & S. K. W. Chu (Eds.), Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue (pp. 207-214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71305-8_16 Go to original source...
    55. Milano, S., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethical aspects of multi-stakeholder recommendation systems. The Information Society, 37(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2020.1832636 Go to original source...
    56. Mokhtari, H., Saberi, M. K., Vakilimofrad, H., & Barkhan, S. (2021). Iranian Authors' Contributions to the Library Philosophy and Practice. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2021, 1-15.
    57. Novelli, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2023). Accountability in artificial intelligence: What it is and how it works. AI & Society, (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01635-y Go to original source...
    58. Ocholla, D. N., Onyancha, O. B., & Britz, J. (2010). Can information ethics be conceptualized by using the core/periphery model? Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.05.001 Go to original source...
    59. Pilerot, O. (2016). Connections between research and practice in the information literacy narrative: A mapping of the literature and some propositions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(4), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614559140 Go to original source...
    60. Pinto, M., Escalona-Fernández, M. I., & Pulgarín, A. (2013). Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: A bibliometric study (1974-2011). Scientometrics, 95(3), 1071-1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0899-y Go to original source...
    61. Pinto, M. J., & Fernandes, S. (2015). New questions arise: Are bibliometric indicators adequate for evaluating the scientific production of the Social Sciences and Humanities? Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2015, 161-169.
    62. Pinto, M., Sales, D., & Fernández-Pascual, R. (2021). Understanding Ethics and Quality in Information Literacy: A Multidimensional Approach. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 21(4), 835-858. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2021.0043 Go to original source...
    63. Ruokolainen, H., & Widén, G. (2020). Conceptualising misinformation in the context of asylum seekers. Information Processing & Management, 57(3), 102127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102127 Go to original source...
    64. Ruokolainen, H., Widén, G., & Eskola, E.-L. (2023). How and why does official information become misinformation? A typology of official misinformation. Library & Information Science Research, 45(2), 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101237 Go to original source...
    65. Secker, J., & Coonan, E. (2012). Rethinking information literacy: A practical framework for supporting learning. Facet. Go to original source...
    66. Semeler, A., Pinto, A., Koltay, T., Dias, T., Oliveira, A., González, J., & Rozados, H. B. F. (2024). ALGORITHMIC LITERACY: Generative Artificial Intelligence technologies for data librarians. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 11(2), 4067. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.4067 Go to original source...
    67. Stahl, B.C. (2008). Discourses on information ethics: the claim to universality. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(2), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9171-9 Go to original source...
    68. Stahl, B. C. (2016). Ethics of European Institutions as Normative Foundation of Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT. In M. Kelly & J. Bielby (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age: A Festschrift in Honor of Rafael Capurro (pp. 207-219). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_12 Go to original source...
    69. Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future: An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9 Go to original source...
    70. Stahl, B. C., Heersmink, R., Goujon, P., Flick, C., Hoven, J. van den, Wakunuma, K., Ikonen, V., & Rader, M. (2010). Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method. International Journal of Technoethics, 1(4), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.4018/jte.2010100102 Go to original source...
    71. Steinerová, J. (2022). Delfská štúdia o informačnej etike: Výsledky analýz diskurzu. ITlib, 26(3-4), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.52036/1335793X.2022.3-4.5-18 Go to original source...
    72. Steinerová, J. (2023). Ethical Issues of Human Information Behaviour and Human Information Interactions. Open Information Science, 7(1), 20220155. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0155 Go to original source...
    73. Steinerová, J. (2023a). Social and epistemic values of information in the framework of information ethics. In Knižničná a informačná veda, 30. Zborník FiFUK, (pp. 9-38). Comenius University in Bratislava.
    74. Steinerová, J. (2023b). Perspektívy rozvoja informačnej etiky v informačnej vede. ProInFlow, 15(2), 35-67. https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2023-33837 Go to original source...
    75. Stopar, K., & Bartol, T. (2019). Digital competences, computer skills and information literacy in secondary education: Mapping and visualization of trends and concepts. Scientometrics, 118(2), 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2990-5 Go to original source...
    76. Tuana, N. (2007). Conceptualizing moral literacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(4), 364-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710762409 Go to original source...
    77. Vakkari, P., Järvelin, K., & Chang, Y.-W. (2023). The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(7), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24757 Go to original source...
    78. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 Go to original source...
    79. Van Otterlo, M. (2018). Ethics and the Value(s) of Artificial Intelligence. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 19(3), 206-209.
    80. Virkus, S. (2013). Information Literacy in Europe: Ten Years Later. In S. Kurbanoğlu, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, R. Catts, & S. Špiranec (Eds.), Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice (pp. 250-257). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03919-0_32 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content