Acta Informatica Pragensia 2025, 14(1), 26-41 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.2515789

Development and Validation of a Blockchain Literacy Scale

Kemal Elciyar ORCID..., Neşe Satılmış ORCID...
Department of Communication Design and Management, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey

Background: The use of blockchain is increasing daily and has become a transformative technology across various sectors. The competent use of blockchain is becoming a fundamental skill. Although numerous studies have attempted to measure digital competencies, the absence of research specifically focused on blockchain literacy has left a significant gap.

Objective: The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of digital literacy and blockchain measurement frameworks, comparing them with existing theoretical digital competence models.

Methods: Furthermore, we introduce a newly developed Blockchain Literacy Scale (BLS). The factorial structure of the BLS is assessed to explore its multidimensional nature. A sample of 591 Turkish college students completed a questionnaire to empirically test its reliability, validity and general applicability.

Results: Both Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported a five-factor structure for the BLS, comprising: information access, information evaluation, economic literacy, legal literacy and risk literacy. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency and reliability.

Conclusion: Directions for future research and the practical implications of the newly developed BLS are discussed in the conclusion.

Keywords: Blockchain; Digital literacy; Online security; Legal regulations; Web 3.0.

Received: June 26, 2024; Revised: October 17, 2024; Accepted: October 18, 2024; Prepublished online: November 3, 2024; Published: January 31, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Elciyar, K., & Satılmış, N. (2025). Development and Validation of a Blockchain Literacy Scale. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 14(1), 26-41. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.251
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Akram, S. V., Malik, P. K., Singh, R., Anita, G., & Tanwar, S. (2020). Adoption of blockchain technology in various realms: Opportunities and challenges. Security and Privacy, 3(5), e109. https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.109 Go to original source...
    2. Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020). Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach. Technology in Society, 62, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320 Go to original source...
    3. AlShamsi, M., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2022). A systematic review on blockchain adoption. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094245 Go to original source...
    4. American Library Association. (1989). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final report. https://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
    5. Auer, R. (2019). Embedded supervision: how to build regulation into blockchain finance. Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper, (371). https://www.bis.org/publ/work811.pdf Go to original source...
    6. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Nassen, K. D. (1998). Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1-2), 393-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00068-2 Go to original source...
    7. Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320 Go to original source...
    8. Batubara, F. R., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2018). Challenges of blockchain technology adoption for e-government: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on digital government research: governance in the data age (pp. 1-9). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209317 Go to original source...
    9. Bharadiya, J. P. (2023). Machine learning and AI in business intelligence: Trends and opportunities. International Journal of Computer, 48(1), 123-134. Go to original source...
    10. Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries, 55(4), 309-322. Go to original source...
    11. Bu, Y., Li, H., & Wu, X. (2022). Effective regulations of FinTech innovations: the case of China. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(8), 751-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1868069 Go to original source...
    12. Caliskan, K. (2020). Data money: The socio-technical infrastructure of cryptocurrency blockchains. Economy and Society, 49(4), 540-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1774258 Go to original source...
    13. Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583 Go to original source...
    14. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. JRC106281/EUR 28558 EN. Joint Research Centre. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC106281/web-digcomp2.1pdf_(online).pdf
    15. Celik, I., Muukkonen, H., & Dogan, S. (2021). A model for understanding new media literacy: Epistemological beliefs and social media use. Library & Information Science Research, 43(4), 101125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101125 Go to original source...
    16. Chen, X., Teng, L., & Chen, W. (2022). How does FinTech affect the development of the digital economy? Evidence from China. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 61, 101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101697 Go to original source...
    17. Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462e494. http://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720 Go to original source...
    18. Chetty, K., Qigui, L., Gcora, N., Josie, J., Wenwei, L., & Fang, C. (2018). Bridging the digital divide: Measuring digital literacy. Economics, 12(1), 20180023. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-23 Go to original source...
    19. Churchill, G.A., Jr. (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110 Go to original source...
    20. Clohessy, T., & Acton, T. (2019). Investigating the influence of organizational factors on blockchain adoption: An innovation theory perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1457-1491. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0365 Go to original source...
    21. Crocetta, C., Antonucci, L., Cataldo, R., Galasso, R., Grassia, M. G., Lauro, C. N., & Marino, M. (2021). Higher-order PLS-PM approach for different types of constructs. Social Indicators Research, 154, 725-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02563-w Go to original source...
    22. Daluwathumullagamage, D., & Sims, A. (2020). Blockchain-enabled corporate governance and regulation. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8020036 Go to original source...
    23. de Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020). Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technology in Society, 62, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 Go to original source...
    24. Dilek, S., Kesgingöz, H., Konak, A., & Halicioğlu, S. (2018). Factors affecting economic literacy. Afro Eurasian Studies, 7(1), 7-47. Go to original source...
    25. Eshet, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9(2), 267-276. Go to original source...
    26. EU Commission. (2005). Green Paper on Financial Services Policy (2005-2010). ECB. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecgreenpaperfinancialservicespolicy2005en.pdf
    27. Furnell, S., & Moore, L. (2014). Security literacy: the missing link in today's online society?. Computer Fraud & Security, 2014(5), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(14)70491-9 Go to original source...
    28. Gammon, M.A., & White, J. (2011). (Social) media literacy: challenges and opportunities for higher education. In Wankel, C. (Ed.) Educating Educators with Social Media (pp. 329-345). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000001019 Go to original source...
    29. Goad, T. W. (2002). Information literacy and workplace performance. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    30. Golosova, J., & Romanovs, A. (2018). The advantages and disadvantages of the blockchain technology. In 2018 IEEE 6th workshop on advances in information, electronic and electrical engineering (AIEEE), (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIEEE.2018.8592253 Go to original source...
    31. Gorevoy, E., Kokhanovskaya, I. I., Nikiporets-Takigawa, G., Bastrykina, T. S., & Sekerin, V. D. (2020). Blockchain technologies: Features of regulation and application in legal practice. Revista Gênero e Interdisciplinaridade, 1(1), 429-442. https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v1i01.47 Go to original source...
    32. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 Go to original source...
    33. Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128 Go to original source...
    34. Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00295-8 Go to original source...
    35. Herian, R. (2018). Regulating blockchain: Critical perspectives in law and technology. Routledge. Go to original source...
    36. Hiremath, B. K., & Kenchakkanavar, A. Y. (2016). An alteration of the web 1.0, web 2.0 and web 3.0: A comparative study. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(4), 705-710.
    37. Hooks, J. B. (2019). The mesh economy: How blockchain and alternative networks can bridge the digital divide and facilitate economic inclusion. In Blockchain Economics: Implications of Distributed Ledgers-Markets, Communications Networks, and Algorithmic Reality (pp. 251-263). Word Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781786346391_0013 Go to original source...
    38. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Sage Publications.
    39. Hutson, J., Banerjee, G., Kshetri, N., Odenwald, K., & Ratican, J. (2023). Architecting the metaverse: blockchain and the financial and legal regulatory challenges of virtual real estate. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2023.151001 Go to original source...
    40. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118-127.
    41. Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2020). A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 302-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.012 Go to original source...
    42. Jha, S. K., & Kumar, S. S. (2022). Cybersecurity in the Age of the Internet of Things: An Assessment of the Users' Privacy and Data Security. In Expert Clouds and Applications: Proceedings of ICOECA 2021 (pp. 49-56). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2126-0_5 Go to original source...
    43. Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 335-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309295 Go to original source...
    44. Jones, B., & Flannigan, S. L. (2006). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st century. Educause Quarterly, 29(2), 8-10.
    45. Jones, M., Luu, T. & Samuel, B. (2024). Measuring cryptocurrency literacy. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4541401 Go to original source...
    46. Khan, N. A., Azhar, M., Rahman, M. N., & Akhtar, M. J. (2022). Scale development and validation for usage of social networking sites during COVID-19. Technology in Society, 70, 102020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102020 Go to original source...
    47. Khan, H. H., Khan, S., & Ghafoor, A. (2023). Fintech adoption, the regulatory environment and bank stability: An empirical investigation from GCC economies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(6), 1263-1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.10.010 Go to original source...
    48. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
    49. Koc, M., & Barut, E. (2016). Development and validation of New Media Literacy Scale (NMLS) for university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 834-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.035 Go to original source...
    50. Komulainen, R., & Nätti, S. (2023). Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113714 Go to original source...
    51. Kouhizadeh, M., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Blockchain and the circular economy: Potential tensions and critical reflections from practice. Production Planning & Control, 31(11-12), 950-966. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1695925 Go to original source...
    52. Kowalski, M., Lee, Z. W., & Chan, T. K. (2021). Blockchain technology and trust relationships in trade finance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120641 Go to original source...
    53. Kushnirovich, N. O. (2011). Determinants of personal economic awareness. Economic Herald of the Donbas, (26), 98-105.
    54. Lin, G. Y., Tseng, T. H., Yeh, C. H., Wang, Y. M., Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2022). Development and validation of an internet unethical behavior scale. Library & Information Science Research, 44(2), 101153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101153 Go to original source...
    55. Loukil, F., Abed, M., & Boukadi, K. (2021). Blockchain adoption in education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5779-5797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10481-8 Go to original source...
    56. Lu, Y. H., Yeh, C. C., & Kuo, Y. M. (2024). Exploring the critical factors affecting the adoption of blockchain: Taiwan's banking industry. Financial Innovation, 10(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00523-0 Go to original source...
    57. Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., Rana, O. F., & Ranjan, R. (2022). Blockchain adoption: A study of cognitive factors underpinning decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107207 Go to original source...
    58. Malik, S., Chadhar, M., Chetty, M., & Vatanasakdakul, S. (2020). An exploratory study of the adoption of blockchain technology among australian organizations: A theoretical model. In 17th European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference, EMCIS 2020 (pp. 205-220). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63396-7_14 Go to original source...
    59. Marengo, A., & Pagano, A. (2023). Investigating the factors influencing the adoption of blockchain technology across different countries and industries: a systematic literatüre review. Electronics, 12(14), 3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12143006 Go to original source...
    60. Mbaidin, H. O., Alsmairat, M. A., & Al-Adaileh, R. (2023). Blockchain adoption for sustainable development in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities in the banking sector. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100199 Go to original source...
    61. Merkley, K. J., Pacelli, J., Piorkowski, M., & Williams, B. (2024). Crypto-influencers. Review of Accounting Studies, 29, 2254-2297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-024-09838-4 Go to original source...
    62. Mohammad, A., & Vargas, S. (2022). Barriers Affecting higher education institutions' adoption of blockchain technology: a Qualitative study. Informatics, 9(3), Article 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9030064 Go to original source...
    63. Mohsin, K. (2021). Blockchain law: A new beginning. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3840220 Go to original source...
    64. Morgan, A., Sibson, R., & Jackson, D. (2022). Digital demand and digital deficit: conceptualising digital literacy and gauging proficiency among higher education students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(3), 258-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2030275 Go to original source...
    65. Morkunas, V. J., Paschen, J., & Boon, E. (2019). How blockchain technologies impact your business model. Business Horizons, 62(3), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.01.009 Go to original source...
    66. Nath, A., & Jana, S. (2023). Data wrangling from socio-academic web-space: Designing a meta model. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 60(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2023/v60i2/170971 Go to original source...
    67. Nikoliĉ, I., Kolluri, A., Sergey, I., Saxena, P., & Hobor, A. (2018). Finding the greedy, prodigal, and suicidal contracts at scale. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 653-663). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274694.3274743 Go to original source...
    68. Oh, S. S., Kim, K. A., Kim, M., Oh, J., Chu, S. H., & Choi, J. (2021). Measurement of digital literacy among older adults: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e26145. https://doi.org/10.2196/26145 Go to original source...
    69. Omarova, S. T. (2020). Dealing with disruption: emerging approaches to fintech regulation. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 61, 25-54.
    70. Orji, I. J., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Huang, S., & Vazquez-Brust, D. (2020). Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 141, 102025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102025 Go to original source...
    71. Otieno, G., & Kiraka, R. (2023). Beyond the innovator's Dilemma: The process and effect of fintech regulatory environment. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2226422. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2226422 Go to original source...
    72. Park, H., Kim, H. S., & Park, H. W. (2021). A scientometric study of digital literacy, ICT literacy, information literacy, and media literacy. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(2), 116-138. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0001 Go to original source...
    73. Piazza, F. S. (2017). Bitcoin and the Blockchain as Possible Corporate Governance Tools: Strengths and Weaknesses. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 5(2), 262-301.
    74. Pina Cesário, F. (2023). Blockchain Technology Adoption: Factors Influencing Intention and Usage. Master's thesis. Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
    75. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Go to original source...
    76. Prewett, K. W., Prescott, G. L., & Phillips, K. (2020). Blockchain adoption is inevitable-Barriers and risks remain. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 31(2), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22415 Go to original source...
    77. Prisco, A., Abdallah, Y. O., Morande, S., & Gheith, M. H. (2024). Factors affecting blockchain adoption in Italian companies: the moderating role of firm size. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(10), 2517-2530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2155511 Go to original source...
    78. Queiroz, M. M., & Wamba, S. F. (2019). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021 Go to original source...
    79. Perkuıiĉ, M., Jozipoviĉ, İ., & Piplica, D. (2020). The need for legal regulation of blockchain and smart contracts in the shipping industry. Transactions on Maritime Science, 9(2), 365-373. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v09.n02.019 Go to original source...
    80. Ragnedda, M., & Destefanis, G. (2019). Blockchain and Web 3.0. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Go to original source...
    81. Rahmatullah, R., Inanna, I., & Ampa, A. T. (2020). How informal education Fosters economic awareness in Children. Dinamika Pendidikan, 15(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v15i2.25285 Go to original source...
    82. Raimundo, R., & Rosário, A. (2021). Blockchain system in the higher education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(1), 276-293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11010021 Go to original source...
    83. Rajasekaran, A. S., Azees, M., & Al-Turjman, F. (2022). A comprehensive survey on blockchain technology. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102039 Go to original source...
    84. Rehman, M. H., Salah, K., Damiani, E., & Svetinovic, D. (2019). Trust in blockchain cryptocurrency ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 67(4), 1196-1212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2948861 Go to original source...
    85. Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., Sharma, B., & Hussein, S. (2023). Essaying the design, development and validation processes of a new digital literacy scale. Online Information Review, 47(2), 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2021-0532 Go to original source...
    86. Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., Igartua, J. J., & González-Vázquez, A. (2016). Development and validation of a digital literacy scale for teenagers. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 1067-1072). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012648 Go to original source...
    87. Ruggieri, S., Gagliano, M., Bonfanti, R. C., Cucinella, N., & Ingoglia, S. (2023). Interaction through social media: Development and validation of a social network site self-efficacy scale (SNS-SES). Acta Psychologica, 235, 103889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103889 Go to original source...
    88. Saghir, W. (2021). The Online Age: The Shift From Traditional Banking to Online Banking in the UK and Its Effect on Applied Regulations. Financial Law Review, 23(3), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834flr.21.021.14441 Go to original source...
    89. Saheb, T., & Mamaghani, F. H. (2021). Exploring the barriers and organizational values of blockchain adoption in the banking industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 32(2), 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2021.100417 Go to original source...
    90. Sankar, L. S., Sindhu, M., & Sethumadhavan, M. (2017). Survey of consensus protocols on blockchain applications. In 2017 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS.2017.8014672 Go to original source...
    91. Sciarelli, M., Prisco, A., Gheith, M. H., & Muto, V. (2022). Factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in innovative Italian companies: An extended TAM approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(3), 495-507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2021-0054 Go to original source...
    92. Shen, P., Li, S., Huang, M., Gao, H., Li, L., Li, J., & Lei, H. (2022). A survey on safety regulation technology of blockchain application and blockchain ecology. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) (pp. 494-499). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/Blockchain55522.2022.00076 Go to original source...
    93. Shivalingaiah, D., & Naik, U. (2008). Comparative study of web 1.0, web 2.0 and web 3.0. In 6th International CALIBER, 2008 (pp. 499-507). INFLIBNET Centre.
    94. Singhal, B., Dhameja, G., & Panda, P. S. (2018). Beginning Blockchain: A Beginner's guide to building Blockchain solutions (Vol. 1). Apress. Go to original source...
    95. Staples, M., Chen, S., Falamaki, S., Ponomarev, A., Rimba, P., Tran, A. B., ... & Zhu, J. (2017). Risks and opportunities for systems using blockchain and smart contracts. Data61. CSIRO. https://research.csiro.au/data61/wp-content/uploads/sites/85/2016/08/Blockchain-RisksandOpps-PDF.pdf
    96. Swan, M. (2017). Anticipating the economic benefits of blockchain. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(10), 6-13. Go to original source...
    97. Subaveerapandiyan, A., Baiju, A., Ahmad, N., Verma, M. K., & Sinha, P. (2024). Exploring metaverse literacy: immersive technologies in library environments. Journal of Web Librarianship, 18(2), 39-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2024.2382688 Go to original source...
    98. Suwanposri, C., Bhatiasevi, V., & Thanakijsombat, T. (2021). Drivers of blockchain adoption in financial and supply chain enterprises. Global Business Review, (in press). https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211046170 Go to original source...
    99. Swire, P. P. (2003). Trustwarp: The Importance of Legal Rules to Electronic Commerce and Internet Privacy. Hastings Law Journal, 54(4), 847-875. Go to original source...
    100. Tandoc Jr, E. C., Yee, A. Z., Ong, J., Lee, J. C. B., Xu, D., Han, Z., ... & Cayabyab, M. Y. (2021). Developing a perceived social media literacy scale: Evidence from Singapore. International Journal of Communication, 15, 2484-2505.
    101. Tifferet, S. (2021). Verifying online information: Development and validation of a self-report scale. Technology in Society, 67, 101788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101788 Go to original source...
    102. Ulfert-Blank, A. S., & Schmidt, I. (2022). Assessing digital self-efficacy: Review and scale development. Computers & Education, 191, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626 Go to original source...
    103. Uysal, M., Üstündağ, M. T., Çelik, A., Tanriverdi, M., Ceran, O., & Ayaz, Z. (2023). Development of Web3 Awareness Scale as the next evolution of the internet. Participatory Educational Research, 11(1), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.15.11.1 Go to original source...
    104. Van Deursen, A. J., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale. Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 804-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834 Go to original source...
    105. Wang, H., Chen, K., & Xu, D. (2016). A maturity model for blockchain adoption. Financial Innovation, 2, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-016-0031-z Go to original source...
    106. White, B. S., King, C. G., & Holladay, J. (2020). Blockchain security risk assessment and the auditor. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 31(2), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22433 Go to original source...
    107. Wong, L. W., Tan, G. W. H., Lee, V. H., Ooi, K. B., & Sohal, A. (2020). Unearthing the determinants of Blockchain adoption in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2100-2123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1730463 Go to original source...
    108. Wu, H., Dwivedi, A. D., & Srivastava, G. (2021). Security and privacy of patient information in medical systems based on blockchain technology. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications, 17(2s), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408321 Go to original source...
    109. Yayar, R., & Karaca, Ö. E. (2017). Economic literacy levels of public officers in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(1), 49-65.
    110. Yildirim, G., & Öztürk, C. (2017). An investigation of the views of field experts and teachers related to economic literacy and its education. Erciyes Journal of Education, 1(2), 1-22. Go to original source...
    111. Zaghloul, E., Li, T., Mutka, M. W., & Ren, J. (2020). Bitcoin and blockchain: Security and privacy. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(10), 10288-10313. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.3004273 Go to original source...
    112. Zamani, E., He, Y., & Phillips, M. (2020). On the security risks of the blockchain. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(6), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1538709 Go to original source...
    113. Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2019). From FinTech to TechFin: The Regulatory Challenges of Data-Driven Finance. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2959925 Go to original source...
    114. Zhang, R., Xue, R., & Liu, L. (2019). Security and privacy on blockchain. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316481 Go to original source...
    115. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (pp. 557-564). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85 Go to original source...
    116. Zohar, A. (2015). Bitcoin: under the hood. Communications of the ACM, 58(9), 104-113. Go to original source...
    117. Zwitter, A., & Hazenberg, J. (2020). Decentralized network governance: Blockchain technology and the future of regulation. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00012 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content