Acta Informatica Pragensia 2025, 14(2), 195-206 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.2622854

Creativity, Artificial Intelligence and (Neo-)Romantic Implicit Religion

Michal Cerny ORCID...
Department of Information and Library Studies, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

Background: The relationship between creativity and generative artificial intelligence (AI) is often reduced to whether a technical system can be creative or how it will transform creative industries. The study is based on the concept of implicit religion, which applies to the relationship between generative artificial intelligence and humans.

Objective: The study identifies two narratives that can be used to explain the relationship between humans and technology in the theoretical field of implicit religion: (Neo-)Romanticism and Enlightenment. (Neo-)Romanticism, emphasising the value of creativity in the process rather than the outcome, can be seen as a form of implicit religion. In contrast, the Enlightenment discourse focuses on traditional AI literacy themes such as understanding the principles of use, knowledge of tools, or the ability to evaluate individual applications in social and ethical practice critically.

Methods: The study uniquely combines small-scale research, which involves in-depth qualitative analysis of a small group of participants, in this case, college students, who provide reflective data from their classroom experiences and creative journals. This is complemented by a theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of implicit religion as it relates to technology. This approach allows a comprehensive exploration of the topic.

Results: The results of the qualitative research show that among the students there is a part of those inclined to the (Neo-)Romantic conception of the relationship between humans and artificial intelligence. This often manifests in rejecting technology, emphasising traditional art, creativity, and the educational process. The results show that reflecting this perspective, strongly connected to emotions and values, in the education process and in complementing conventional AI literacy concepts is necessary.

Conclusion: The study shows that transformation of the economy and society is not just a technical or economic phenomenon but will require a more profound philosophical and cultural reflection that will allow us to leave the binary oppositional relationship between Enlightenment and (Neo-)Romanticism.

Keywords: Creativity; Generative artificial intelligence; AI; Implicit religion; Small-scale research; College students; Sociology.

Received: October 24, 2024; Revised: February 7, 2025; Accepted: February 12, 2025; Prepublished online: March 13, 2025; Published: July 26, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cerny, M. (2025). Creativity, Artificial Intelligence and (Neo-)Romantic Implicit Religion. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 14(2), 195-206. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.262
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aboelmaged, M., Bani-Melhem, S., Ahmad Al-Hawari, M., & Ahmad, I. (2024). Conversational AI Chatbots in library research: An integrative review and future research agenda. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, (in press). https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231224440 Go to original source...
    2. Al-Ababneh, M. (2020). The Concept of Creativity: Definitions and Theories. International Journal of Tourism & Hotel Business Management, 2(1), 245-249.
    3. Aoki, B. Y., & Greiner, C. (2020). Affective market in Japan: A study on Gatebox and loving relationships with characters. Comunicacao, 17(49), 295-322. https://doi.org/10.18568/CMC.V17I49.2152 Go to original source...
    4. Arendt, H. (1973). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    5. Arendt, H. (2006). On revolution. Penguin Books.
    6. Azzam, A. M. (2009). Why creativity now? A conversation with Sir Ken Robinson. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 22-26.
    7. Badmus, O., Rajput, S., Arogundade, J., & Williams, M. (2024). AI-driven business analytics and decision making. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24, 616-633. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.3093 Go to original source...
    8. Bai̇doo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500 Go to original source...
    9. Bailey, E. (1990). The Implicit Religion of Contemporary Society: Some Studies and Reflections. Social Compass, 37(4), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776890037004006 Go to original source...
    10. Bailey, E. (2010). Implicit Religion. Religion, 40(4), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2010.07.002 Go to original source...
    11. Baker, G. P., Baker, G., & Morris, K. J. (2002). Descartes' dualism. Psychology Press.
    12. Bauman, Z. (2007). Modernity and the Holocaust (Reprint). Polity Press.
    13. Bauman, Z. (2013a). Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.
    14. Bauman, Z. (2013b). The Individualized Society. John Wiley & Sons.
    15. Bauman, Z., & Donskis, L. (2016). Liquid Evil. John Wiley & Sons.
    16. Bělohradský, V. (1997). Mezi světy & mezisvěty: Filosofické dialogy. Votobia.
    17. Bělohradský, V. (2021). Čas pléthokracie: Když části jsou větší než celky a světový duch spadl z koně. Nakladatelství 65. pole.
    18. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Anchor Books.
    19. Besecke, K. (2005). Seeing invisible religion: Religion as a societal conversation about transcendent meaning. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 179-196. Go to original source...
    20. Booch, G., Fabiano, F., Horesh, L., Kate, K., Lenchner, J., Linck, N., & Srivastava, B. (2021). Thinking fast and slow in AI. In Proceedings of the The Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-21), (pp. 15042-15046). AAAI. Go to original source...
    21. Bory, P. (2019). Deep new: The shifting narratives of artificial intelligence from Deep Blue to AlphaGo. Convergence, 25(4), 627-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519829679 Go to original source...
    22. Bridle, J. (2018). New dark age: Technology and the end of the future. Verso Books.
    23. Buber, M. (2017). Ich und Du (17. Aufl). Gütersloher Verl.-Haus.
    24. Catholic Review. (2024, January 12). Renew the world with creativity, bold dreams, pope tells young people. Catholic Review. https://catholicreview.org/renew-the-world-with-creativity-bold-dreams-pope-tells-young-people/
    25. Cerny, M. (2023). Filozofie edukace jako reflexe společnosti: Analýza krize modernity v románech Murakamiho a Houellebecqa. Pedagogická orientace, 33(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2023-2-244 Go to original source...
    26. Cetindamar, D., Kitto, K., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., Abedin, B., & Knight, S. (2022). Explicating AI literacy of employees at digital workplaces. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 810-823. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3138503 Go to original source...
    27. Chaplin, S., & Faflak, J. (2011). The Romanticism Handbook. A&C Black.
    28. Chardin, P. T. de. (1964). Le phénomène humain. Éditions du Seuil.
    29. Civit, M., Drai-Zerbib, V., Lizcano, D., & Escalona, M. J. (2024). SunoCaps: A novel dataset of text-prompt based AI-generated music with emotion annotations. Data in Brief, 55, 110743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110743 Go to original source...
    30. Cobb, P. J. (2023). Large Language Models and Generative AI, Oh My!: Archaeology in the Time of ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Beyond. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 11(3), 363-369. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2023.20 Go to original source...
    31. Coeckelbergh, M., & Gunkel, D. J. (2023). ChatGPT: deconstructing the debate and moving it forward. AI & Society, 39(5), 2221-2231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01710-4 Go to original source...
    32. Dai, Y., Chai, C.-S., Lin, P.-Y., Jong, M. S.-Y., Guo, Y., & Qin, J. (2020). Promoting Students' Well-Being by Developing Their Readiness for the Artificial Intelligence Age. Sustainability, 12(16), 6597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166597 Go to original source...
    33. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam.
    34. Damasio, A. R. (2018). The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of the cultures. Pantheon Books.
    35. Descartes, R., & Cottingham, J. (Eds.). (1996). Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    36. Dillon, S., & Schaffer-Goddard, J. (2023). What AI researchers read: The role of literature in artificial intelligence research. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2079214 Go to original source...
    37. Eguchi, A., Okada, H., & Muto, Y. (2021). Contextualizing AI Education for K-12 Students to Enhance Their Learning of AI Literacy Through Culturally Responsive Approaches. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00737-3 Go to original source...
    38. Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against Method. Verso.
    39. Feyerabend, P. (2004). Věda jako umění. Ježek.
    40. Floridi, L. (2011). The Construction of Personal Identities Online. Minds And Machines, 21(4), 477-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9254-y Go to original source...
    41. Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    42. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
    43. Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2015). The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Springer. Go to original source...
    44. Floridi, L. (2019). Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(6), 261-262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y Go to original source...
    45. Floridi, L. (2023). AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. Philosophy & Technology, 36(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y Go to original source...
    46. Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2024). On the Creativity of Large Language Models (arXiv:2304.00008). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00008 Go to original source...
    47. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 Go to original source...
    48. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Farrar.
    49. Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man (1st Free Press trade pbk. ed). Free Press.
    50. Gallese, V., & Cuccio, V. (2015). The Paradigmatic Body: Embodied Simulation, Intersubjectivity, the Bodily Self, and Language. In T. Metzinger & Windt (Eds.), Open Mind (pp. 1-23). MIND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958570269 Go to original source...
    51. Goldberg, E. (2018). Creativity: The Human Brain in the Age of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
    52. Harnad, S. (2001). What's wrong and right about Searle's Chinese Room argument? In Essays on Searle's Chinese room argument. Oxford University Press.
    53. Heidegger, M. (1944). Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung. Klostermann.
    54. Heidegger, M. (1967a). Being and Time. Blackwell.
    55. Heidegger, M. (1967b). Die Frage nach der Technik ; Wissenschaft und Besinnung ; Überwindung der Metaphysik ; Wer ist Nietzsches Zarathustra?. Neske.
    56. Heidegger, M. (1976). What Is Called Thinking?. HarperCollins.
    57. Heidegger, M. (2000). O humanismu. Ježek.
    58. Heidegger, M. (2006). Básnicky bydlí člověk. Oikoymenh.
    59. Heidegger, M. (2013a). Martin Heidegger: Rozhovory k osmdesátým narozeninám. Oikoymenh.
    60. Heidegger, M. (2013b). Už jenom nějaký Bůh nás může zachránit. Oikoymenh.
    61. Hejdánek, L. (1997). Nepředmětnost v myšlení a ve skutečnosti. Oikoymenh.
    62. Helmanto, F., & Dayana, Y. F. (2024). The Development of Musicalization Poetry assisted by Artificial Intelligence. Foremost Journal, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v5i2.5131 Go to original source...
    63. Hui, X., Reshef, O., & Zhou, L. (2023). The Short-Term Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Employment: Evidence from an Online Labor Market . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4527336 Go to original source...
    64. Inkster, B., Sarda, S., & Subramanian, V. (2018). An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(11), e12106. https://doi.org/10.2196/12106 Go to original source...
    65. Jefferson, M., & Anderson, M. (2017). Transforming schools: Creativity, critical reflection, communication, collaboration. Bloomsbury Publishing.
    66. Johansson, I.-R. (2023). A Tale of Two Texts, a Robot, and Authorship: A Comparison Between a Human-Written and a ChatGPT-Generated Text. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-60674
    67. Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied Mind, Meaning, and Reason. University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
    68. JRC - CEU. (2022). Council conclusions on supporting well-being in digital education. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/scientific-activities-z/education-and-training/well-being-education_en
    69. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
    70. Kant, I. (1999). K věčnému míru. O obecném rčení: Je-li něco správné v teorii, nemusí se to ještě hodit pro praxi. Oikoymenh.
    71. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed). University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
    72. Lakoff, G. (1990). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago press.
    73. LaMeres, B. J. (2023). Introduction to Logic Circuits & Logic Design with VHDL. Springer Nature. Go to original source...
    74. Larsen, C. M., Terkelsen, A. S., Carlsen, A.-M. F., & Kristensen, H. K. (2019). Methods for teaching evidence-based practice: A scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1681-0 Go to original source...
    75. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
    76. Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime (English edition). Polity Press.
    77. Latour, B. (2021). After lockdown: A metamorphosis. Polity Press.
    78. Latzer, M. (2022). The Digital Trinity-Controllable Human Evolution-Implicit Everyday Religion: Characteristics of the Socio-Technical Transformation of Digitalization. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 74(S1), 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-022-00841-8 Go to original source...
    79. Lee, H.-K. (2022). Rethinking creativity: Creative industries, AI and everyday creativity. Media, Culture & Society, 44(3), 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221077009 Go to original source...
    80. Levinas, E. (2020). Totalita a nekonečno. Oikoymenh.
    81. Lin, C.-H., Yu, C.-C., Shin, P.-K., & Wu, L. Y. (2021). STEM based Artificial Intelligence Learning in General Education for Non-Engineering Undergraduate Students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(24), 224-237.
    82. Lollini, M. (2022). Time of the End? More-Than-Human Humanism and Artificial Intelligence. Humanist Studies & the Digital Age, 7(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/hsda/7.1.3 Go to original source...
    83. Lou, B., Sun, H., & Sun, T. (2023). GPTs and Labor Markets in the Developing Economy: Evidence from China (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4426461). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4426461 Go to original source...
    84. Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion. Macmillan.
    85. Magni, D., Del Gaudio, G., Papa, A., & Della Corte, V. (2024). Digital humanism and artificial intelligence: The role of emotions beyond the human-machine interaction in Society 5.0. Journal of Management History, 30(2), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-12-2022-0084 Go to original source...
    86. Matějčková, T. (2022). Kdo tu mluvil o vítězství?. Nakladatelství Karolinum.
    87. Matějčková, T. (2023). Bůh je mrtev. Nic není dovoleno. Echo Media.
    88. Mathews, J. T. (2000). The Information Revolution. Foreign Policy, 119, 63-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149529 Go to original source...
    89. Mertala, P., Fagerlund, J., & Calderon, O. (2022). Finnish 5th and 6th grade students' pre-instructional conceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) and their implications for AI literacy education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100095 Go to original source...
    90. Mukminin, M. S., Putra, L. D., Muhhit, A. A., & Tenis, A. B. (2024). Personification Language Style in The Poem Created by ChatGPT. Journal of Education and Contemporary Linguistics, 1(2), Article 2.
    91. Nazareno, L., & Schiff, D. S. (2021). The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well-being. Technology in Society, 67, 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101679 Go to original source...
    92. Oschinski, M. (2023, August 14). Assessing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Germany's Labor Market: Insights from a ChatGPT Analysis [MPRA Paper]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/118300/
    93. Purser, R. (2019). McMindfulness: How mindfulness became the new capitalist spirituality. Repeater.
    94. Ricœur, P. (2016). O sobě samém jako o jiném. Oikoymenh.
    95. Robertson, D. S. (1990). The Information Revolution. Communication Research, 17(2), 235-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002005 Go to original source...
    96. Schober, R. (2022). Passing the Turing Test? AI Generated Poetry and Posthuman Creativity. In H. Nagl-Docekal & W. Zacharasiewicz (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Human Enhancement: Affirmative and Critical Approaches in the Humanities, (pp. 151-166). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110770216-009 Go to original source...
    97. Simonton, D.K. (2017). Big-C Versus Little-c Creativity: Definitions, Implications, and Inherent Educational Contradictions. In Beghetto, R., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creative Contradictions in Education. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, (pp. 3-19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_1 Go to original source...
    98. Šíp, R. (2019). Proč školství a jeho aktéři selhávají. Masarykova univerzita. Go to original source...
    99. Špidlík, T., & Rupnik, M. I. (2015). Integrální poznání: Symbol jako nejdokonalejší výpověď. Refugium Velehrad-Roma, s.r.o.
    100. Stuhlemer, J. (2017). Romanticism as a Transition to Modernity: The Romantic Period in Literature as a Transitional Phase. GRIN Verlag.
    101. Thoreau, H. D., & Searls, D. (2009). The journal, 1837-1861. New York Review Books.
    102. Webster, F. (2014). Theories of the information society. Routledge. Go to original source...
    103. Webster, F., & Blom, R. (Eds.). (2020). The information society reader. Routledge.
    104. Wu, Z., Ji, D., Yu, K., Zeng, X., Wu, D., Shidujaman, M. (2021). AI Creativity and the Human-AI Co-creation Model. In Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools, (pp. 171-190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_13 Go to original source...
    105. Zarifhonarvar, A. (2024). Economics of ChatGPT: A labor market view on the occupational impact of artificial intelligence. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 3(2), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-10-2023-0021 Go to original source...
    106. Zouhar, J. (2016). Racionalita a každodennost. Studia philosophica, 63(2), 7-16.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content