Acta Informatica Pragensia 2025, 14(3), 422-444 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.2672107

Optimizing Battery Charging in Wireless Sensor Networks: Performance Assessment of MPPT Algorithms in Different Environmental Settings

Abdullah Fadhil Noor Shubbar ORCID...1, Serkan Savaş ORCID...2, Osman Güler ORCID...3
1 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey
2 Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey
3 Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkey

Background: Photovoltaic (PV)-based energy harvesting systems are crucial for ensuring the sustainability and long-term operation of wireless sensor networks (WSNs), especially in remote or infrastructure-less environments. Given the critical role of battery performance in WSN reliability, efficient energy management through Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms is essential to adapt to variable environmental conditions such as solar irradiance and ambient temperature.

Objective: This study aims to comparatively assess the performance of four widely adopted MPPT algorithms—Perturb and Observe (P&O), Incremental Conductance (IC), Fuzzy Logic (FL), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)—in enhancing battery charging efficiency in PV-powered WSNs under dynamic environmental conditions.

Methods: A simulation-based evaluation framework was developed using MATLAB/Simulink to model a PV-powered WSN system. Each MPPT algorithm was implemented and tested using the same simulation conditions, with key performance metrics including voltage and current overshoot, response time, energy transfer efficiency, and adaptability to fluctuating irradiance and temperature profiles. A Proportional-Integral (PI) controller was also used to manage the battery charging process, and environmental profiles were varied across simulation periods to assess algorithm robustness.

Results: The PSO algorithm achieved superior performance across all metrics, demonstrating the fastest response time (0.1 s), lowest overshoot (14.8 V, 25 mA), and highest energy transfer efficiency. IC and FL methods showed balanced adaptability and performance, while P&O lagged in both responsiveness and efficiency. The simulation results also confirmed that environmental conditions significantly affect PV panel output and battery State of Charge (SoC), highlighting the necessity for adaptive MPPT solutions.

Conclusion: This study provides a unified and realistic comparative analysis of major MPPT algorithms for PV-powered WSNs. The PSO algorithm emerges as the most effective, though its computational complexity may limit its application in low-power systems. IC and FL serve as promising alternatives for scenarios with resource constraints. The findings contribute to the design of environmentally adaptive and energy-efficient WSNs, paving the way for their robust deployment in real-world settings.

Keywords: Photovoltaic; MPPT Algorithms; Wireless sensor networks; Battery charging; PSO; Maximum power point tracking.

Received: February 13, 2025; Revised: May 7, 2025; Accepted: May 9, 2025; Prepublished online: May 11, 2025; Published: August 19, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Shubbar, A.F.N., Savaş, S., & Güler, O. (2025). Optimizing Battery Charging in Wireless Sensor Networks: Performance Assessment of MPPT Algorithms in Different Environmental Settings. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 14(3), 422-444. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.267
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4 Go to original source...
    2. Alsharif, M. H., Kim, S., & Kuruoğlu, N. (2019). Energy Harvesting Techniques for Wireless Sensor Networks/Radio-Frequency Identification: A Review. Symmetry, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11070865 Go to original source...
    3. Alsharif, M. H., Nordin, R., & Ismail, M. (2015). Energy optimisation of hybrid off-grid system for remote telecommunication base station deployment in Malaysia. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2015(1), Article 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13638-015-0284-7 Go to original source...
    4. Ammari, H. M. (2014). The Art of Wireless Sensor Networks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40066-7 Go to original source...
    5. Anand, M., Anusha, N., Anitha, P., Chaitanyalaksmi, G., & Divyashree, J. K. (2021). An Efficient Solar Energy Harvesting Management with MPPT for WSN. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 4(8), 250-253.
    6. Antony, S. M., Indu, S., & Pandey, R. (2020). An efficient solar energy harvesting system for wireless sensor network nodes. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 41(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2020.1714182 Go to original source...
    7. Ay, İ., Kademli, M., Savaş, S., Karellas, S., Markopoulos, A., Hatzilau, C.-S., Devlin, P., Duşbudak, H., Arslan, A. S., Koç, M., Duraklar, K., Sunal, K., & Ozer, M. M. (2023). Smart Maintenance with Regression Analysis for Efficiency Improvement in Photovoltaic Energy Systems. Journal of Solar Energy Research, 8(4), 1663-1679. https://doi.org/10.22059/JSER.2023.363200.1335 Go to original source...
    8. Ay, İ., Kademli, M., Karabulut, S., & Savas, S. (2022). Affecting Factors of Efficiency in Photovoltaic Energy Systems and Productivity-Enhancing Suggestions. In 2022 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference, (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASYU56188.2022.9925271 Go to original source...
    9. Başoğlu, M. E., & Çakir, B. (2015). An improved incremental conductance based MPPT approach for PV modules. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 23(6), 1687-1697. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1404-196 Go to original source...
    10. Cao, L., Wang, Z., & Yue, Y. (2022). Analysis and Prospect of the Application of Wireless Sensor Networks in Ubiquitous Power Internet of Things. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 9004942. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9004942 Go to original source...
    11. Colesanti, U. M., Santini, S., & Vitaletti, A. (2011). DISSense: An adaptive ultralow-power communication protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 2011 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops, DCOSS'11. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DCOSS.2011.5982162 Go to original source...
    12. Cubas, J., Pindado, S., & De Manuel, C. (2014). Explicit Expressions for Solar Panel Equivalent Circuit Parameters Based on Analytical Formulation and the Lambert W-Function. Energies, 7(7), 4098-4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074098 Go to original source...
    13. Gad, A. G. (2022). Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications: A Systematic Review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(5), 2531-2561. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11831-021-09694-4 Go to original source...
    14. Getahun, M., Azath, M., Sharma, D. P., Tuni, A., & Adane, A. (2022). Efficient Energy Utilization Algorithm through Energy Harvesting for Heterogeneous Clustered Wireless Sensor Network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 4154742. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4154742 Go to original source...
    15. Hauke, B. (2015). Basic Calculation of a Buck Converter's Power Stage. Texas Instruments. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva477b/slva477b.pdf
    16. Hidalgo-Leon, R., Urquizo, J., Silva, C. E., Silva-Leon, J., Wu, J., Singh, P., & Soriano, G. (2022). Powering nodes of wireless sensor networks with energy harvesters for intelligent buildings: A review. Energy Reports, 8, 3809-3826. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2022.02.280 Go to original source...
    17. Lakshmi, S., & Raja, S. R. (2014). Design and implementation of an observer controller for a buck converter. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 22(3), 562-572. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1208-41 Go to original source...
    18. Mazunga, F., & Nechibvute, A. (2021). Ultra-low power techniques in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks: Recent advances and issues. Scientific African, 11, e00720. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIAF.2021.E00720 Go to original source...
    19. Melikov, A., & Rustamov, A. (2012). Queuing Management in Wireless Sensor Networks for QoS Measurement. Wireless Sensor Network, 4(9), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.4236/WSN.2012.49031 Go to original source...
    20. Narwat, L. K., & Dhillon, J. (2021). Design and Operation of Fuzzy Logic Based MPPT Controller under Uncertain Condition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1854(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1854/1/012035 Go to original source...
    21. Ponnimbaduge Perera, T. D., Jayakody, D. N. K., Sharma, S. K., Chatzinotas, S., & Li, J. (2018). Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT): Recent Advances and Future Challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(1), 264-302. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2783901 Go to original source...
    22. Reza Reisi, A., Hassan Moradi, M., & Jamasb, S. (2013). Classification and comparison of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2012.11.052 Go to original source...
    23. Rokonuzzaman, M. D., Mishu, M. K., Amin, N., Nadarajah, M., Roy, R. B., Rahman, K. S., Buhari, A. M., Binzaid, S., Shakeri, M., & Pasupuleti, J. (2021). Self-Sustained Autonomous Wireless Sensor Network with Integrated Solar Photovoltaic System for Internet of Smart Home-Building (IoSHB) Applications. Micromachines, 12(6), 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/MI12060653 Go to original source...
    24. Salman, S., Ai, X., & Wu, Z. (2018). Design of a P-&-O algorithm based MPPT charge controller for a stand-alone 200W PV system. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41601-018-0099-8/FIGURES/10 Go to original source...
    25. Sharma, H., Haque, A., & Jaffery, Z. A. (2018). Modeling and Optimisation of a Solar Energy Harvesting System for Wireless Sensor Network Nodes. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 7(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/JSAN7030040 Go to original source...
    26. Singh, J., Kaur, R., & Singh, D. (2021). Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: A taxonomic survey. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(1), 118-140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5816 Go to original source...
    27. Sucupira, L., & Castro-Gomes, J. (2021). Review of Energy Harvesting for Buildings Based on Solar Energy and Thermal Materials. CivilEng, 2(4), 852-873. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng2040046 Go to original source...
    28. Vinod, Kumar, R., & Singh, S. K. (2018). Solar photovoltaic modeling and simulation: As a renewable energy solution. Energy Reports, 4, 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2018.09.008 Go to original source...
    29. You, S., Eshraghian, J. K., Iu, H. C., & Cho, K. (2021). Low-Power Wireless Sensor Network Using Fine-Grain Control of Sensor Module Power Mode. Sensors, 21(9), 3198. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093198 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content