Acta Informatica Pragensia 2015, 4(1), 4-17 | DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.483088

Současný stav používání agilních metodik ve světě a v ČR

Martin Tománek
Department of Systems Analysis, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics, Prague, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, Czech Republic

Cílem článku je porovnat používání agilních metodik ve světě a v České republice. Toto porovnání je provedeno formou komparativní analýzy dvou dostupných průzkumů uskutečněných v roce 2013 a publikovaných v roce 2014. Porovnání je dále obohaceno o výsledky dosud nepublikovaného průzkumu používání agilních metodik v nadnárodní logistické společnosti, který byl také proveden v roce 2013. Na základě tohoto celkového porovnání je dále diskutován možný další vývoj používání agilních přístupů v České republice s ohledem na světový trend.

Keywords: Agilní metodika, Scrum, Extrémní programování, vývoj softwaru

Current State of Agile Methodologies Worldwide and in the Czech Republic

The objective of this research paper is to compare the current state of agile methodologies in the world and in the Czech Republic. The comparison is executed as the comparative analysis of two publicly available researches conducted in 2013 and published in 2014. The comparison is further enriched by the results of the unpublished survey in the global logistics company which was conducted also in 2013. The potential trend for agile methodologies in the Czech Republic is also discussed with regard to the worldwide trend.

Keywords: Agile, Scrum, Extreme programming, Software development

Received: January 3, 2015; Revised: June 5, 2015; Accepted: June 14, 2015; Published: June 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tománek, M. (2015). Current State of Agile Methodologies Worldwide and in the Czech Republic. Acta Informatica Pragensia4(1), 4-17. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.48
Download citation

References

  1. Agilní Asociace. (2014). Agile Prague Conference. Dostupné z http://agileprague.com/
  2. Baumeister, A., & Ilg, M. (2013). Financial Management and Control of Iterative Software Processes. In Annual International Conference on Accounting & Finance (s. 33-38). doi: 10.5176/2251-1997_AF13.16 Go to original source...
  3. Beck, K. (2000). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Indianapolis: Addison-Wesley Professional.
  4. Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A. van, Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., et al. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Dostupné z http://agilemanifesto.org/
  5. Benefield, G. (2008). Rolling Out Agile in a Large Enterprise. In 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.382 Go to original source...
  6. Buchalcevová, A. (2006). Stav používání agilních metodik v ČR. Systémová integrace, 13(4), 23-31.
  7. Buchalcevová, A. (2009). Metodiky budování informacních systému. Praha: Oeconomica.
  8. Kettunen, V., Kasurinen, J., Taipale, O., & Smolander, K. (2010). A study on agility and testing processes in software organizations. In 19th international symposium on Software testing and analysis (s. 231-240). New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1831708.1831737 Go to original source...
  9. Li, J., Moe, N. B., & Dyba, T. (2010). Transition from a plan-driven process to Scrum: a longitudinal case study on software quality. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1852786.1852804 Go to original source...
  10. Pulkert, D. (2014). Průzkum agilního řízení v ČR 2013. Etnetera. Dostupné z http://www.etnetera.cz/public/1b/43/e5/52571_103079_agilni_dotaznik_report_2013_5.pdf
  11. Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2013, srpen). The Scrum Guide, Průvodce Scrumem: Pravidla hry. Dostupné z https://www.scrum.org/Portals/0/Documents/Scrum%20Guides/2013/Scrum-Guide-CS.pdf
  12. Stavru, S. (2014). A critical examination of recent industrial surveys on agile method usage. Journal of Systems and Software, 94, 87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.041 Go to original source...
  13. Stoica, M., Mircea, M., & Ghilic-Micu, B. (2013). Software Development: Agile vs. Traditional. Informatica Economica, 17(4), 64-76. doi: 10.12948/issn14531305/17.4.2013.06 Go to original source...
  14. Sumrell, M. (2007). From Waterfall to Agile - How does a QA Team Transition? In Proceedings of the Agile Conference (AGILE) 2007 (s. 291-295). Washington: IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/AGILE.2007.29 Go to original source...
  15. Sutherland, J., Jakobsen, C. R., & Johnson, K. (2007). Scrum and CMMI Level 5: The Magic Potion for Code Warriors. In Proceedings of the Agile Conference (AGILE) 2007 (s. 272-278). doi: 10.1109/AGILE.2007.52 Go to original source...
  16. Tomanek, M., Cermak, R., & Smutny, Z. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Web Development Projects Based on Project Management and Agile Development Principles. In 10th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance (s. 550-558). Reading: ACPI.
  17. Tomanek, M., & Klima, T. (2015). Penetration Testing in Agile Software Development Projects. International Journal on Cryptography and Information Security, 5(1). doi: 10.5121/ijcis.2015.5101 Go to original source...
  18. VersionOne. (2006). Survey: The State of Agile Development. VersionOne Inc. Dostupné z http://www.versionone.com/pdf/2006-state-of-agile-survey.pdf
  19. VersionOne. (2014, červen 30). 8th Annual State of Agile Survey. VersionOne Inc. Dostupné z http://www.versionone.com/pdf/2013-state-of-agile-survey.pdf

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.